Active Users:861 Time:30/10/2026 06:26:30 AM
Re: Just to note.... rempires Send a noteboard - 14/12/2010 08:32:46 PM
I actually had a mild (albiet very mild) concussion from it, they did the cat scan because i broke playing ultimate Frisbee when 2 people collided with me and then i went down. I also just asked my mother about this, she is a nurse she says that, her hospital at least, has a policy that all head injuries get some form of a test (usually a cat scan) done, i guess this prevents frivolous law suits if they would happen to miss something,you can refuse but you can refuse any service as long as your in a right state of mind, but then the hospital can't be held accountable because it was your choice. I would consider this a good indication about our society and how mistakes are punished to the point it hurts people and makes legitimate claims look bad. or as most people call it, we're a sue crazy society....

Unless your broken nose included other head trauma, there is absolutely no reason you needed a CAT scan. It did nothing more then subject you to a *huge* amount of radiation that you don't need, and it didn't do anything that a normal X-ray coudln't do.


And it's a pretty sad indication of what the system's come to and why it's gotten to be so expensive that people can't afford it in the first place.
This message last edited by rempires on 14/12/2010 at 08:40:19 PM
Reply to message
Federal judge in Va. strikes down health care law - - 13/12/2010 05:21:37 PM 1227 Views
*yawn* - 13/12/2010 05:46:58 PM 882 Views
Another step closer to SCOTUS.....and that will be 5-4 decision in favor of repeal! *NM* - 13/12/2010 05:55:54 PM 349 Views
It may very well end up that way. *NM* - 13/12/2010 07:09:36 PM 387 Views
So riddle me this... - 13/12/2010 07:23:14 PM 875 Views
He's not "making his own law", just denying the government the ability to..... - 13/12/2010 08:06:48 PM 843 Views
That wasn't my question. - 13/12/2010 09:10:39 PM 942 Views
I get what you're saying... - 13/12/2010 11:30:13 PM 936 Views
Re: I get what you're saying... - 14/12/2010 01:34:13 AM 976 Views
*heh* - 14/12/2010 04:01:35 PM 872 Views
That's not all they're saying, though. - 14/12/2010 01:42:27 AM 842 Views
At least in my mind.... - 14/12/2010 04:10:38 PM 845 Views
Agreed; when do I get a refund for my share of the B2 bomber? - 14/12/2010 04:40:25 AM 873 Views
But see...you are using the B2 bomber. - 14/12/2010 03:59:27 PM 798 Views
Much as you are using the healthcare system. - 14/12/2010 05:55:40 PM 919 Views
*nods* - 14/12/2010 06:09:42 PM 916 Views
Re: So riddle me this... - 14/12/2010 02:51:35 AM 846 Views
It's judicial review - 14/12/2010 02:47:43 PM 898 Views
Re: It's judicial review - 14/12/2010 03:27:28 PM 881 Views
Re: It's judicial review - 15/12/2010 05:35:17 PM 1006 Views
I really don't understand why people defend the forced purchase aspect - 13/12/2010 08:22:03 PM 919 Views
This analogy no doubt has its flaws too, but I was just reminded of it... - 13/12/2010 08:52:31 PM 939 Views
That's precisely the logic, yes. - 14/12/2010 04:31:44 AM 891 Views
This judge... - 13/12/2010 11:26:09 PM 929 Views
there is a major problem with this.. - 14/12/2010 01:29:41 AM 881 Views
Bad analogy..... - 14/12/2010 02:57:28 AM 850 Views
Re: Bad analogy..... - 14/12/2010 03:23:31 AM 857 Views
Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance..... - 14/12/2010 03:42:26 AM 839 Views
Re: Not everyone uses the HC system and many can pay for it without insurance..... - 14/12/2010 04:53:39 AM 865 Views
Just to note.... - 14/12/2010 06:11:57 PM 840 Views
Re: Just to note.... - 14/12/2010 06:44:54 PM 846 Views
Re: Just to note.... - 14/12/2010 08:32:46 PM 837 Views
I'll excerpt some relevant passages, but the full article is in the link. - 14/12/2010 02:10:48 PM 1012 Views
In other words there may be a painful silver lining. - 14/12/2010 07:46:38 PM 767 Views
Update: the judge's decision is basically nonsense. - 14/12/2010 08:04:27 PM 1103 Views

Reply to Message