Active Users:373 Time:30/04/2025 01:19:45 PM
What about it? Shannow Send a noteboard - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM
That perfectly encapsulates the difference between striving for purity from within, as opposed to superficial and hypocritical purity only when others can see what you are doing (like the guy that is the subject of this thread).

In other words, you must strive for pure thougths first and foremost, and then pure actions will flow from that.

Of course, none of us can achieve that, because we are imperfect, but we must forever be striving to achieve it nevertheless.

Reply to message
Ted Haggard Would Be Bisexual If He Was a Hot 21-Year-Old - 27/01/2011 05:01:12 PM 1329 Views
OK *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:10:10 PM 531 Views
Not sure what the point of this post was *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:50:59 PM 496 Views
It was something that made me laugh? - 27/01/2011 06:53:09 PM 845 Views
yeah you were only insulting people's religion, no reason to get worked up. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:24:55 PM 497 Views
Er, pretty sure just laughing at what one guy said, plus a pun on the word "hard" - 27/01/2011 09:40:29 PM 777 Views
I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 10:10:26 PM 829 Views
Re: I am an athiest so I don't care - 27/01/2011 11:10:21 PM 815 Views
bullshit - 28/01/2011 03:54:41 PM 1013 Views
Moron. *NM* - 29/01/2011 03:48:35 PM 458 Views
Well put. - 29/01/2011 04:48:00 PM 1126 Views
Or he'd still be closeted because of twisted, hateful strains of Christianity. *NM* - 27/01/2011 06:56:04 PM 401 Views
If your religion states homosexuality is wrong, then it is a position of principle... - 27/01/2011 06:59:04 PM 914 Views
Wow, you really don't understand what it is to be human - 27/01/2011 08:51:17 PM 776 Views
I'm sure you'll agree that a religious debate is not really called for here... - 27/01/2011 09:10:38 PM 861 Views
Homosexuality =/= homosexual sex. - 27/01/2011 09:16:50 PM 794 Views
Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:23:54 PM 1039 Views
Re: Err...no. - 27/01/2011 09:42:00 PM 982 Views
You seem to want to argue about what is allowed and what is not allowed... - 27/01/2011 10:08:10 PM 856 Views
So I am curious on your thoughts of Matthew 5:28 *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:30:50 PM 432 Views
What about it? - 28/01/2011 03:26:19 PM 875 Views
not really - 27/01/2011 10:15:32 PM 1050 Views
I completely and utterly disagree - 27/01/2011 10:39:10 PM 786 Views
Replace "Christian Faith" with "hardcore Calvinism" and I'll go away. - 28/01/2011 12:35:36 AM 756 Views
Brush up on your Romans and Corinthians - 28/01/2011 03:30:24 PM 1176 Views
I think that covered it pretty well. - 27/01/2011 11:23:13 PM 918 Views
Is it possible to have faith, but not agree with your church's stance on subjects?. *NM* - 27/01/2011 09:15:14 PM 455 Views
Of course. Faith is a broad concept. But... - 27/01/2011 09:20:54 PM 944 Views
Absolutely. - 27/01/2011 11:17:19 PM 722 Views
Nicely said *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:19:54 PM 454 Views
Agreed. - 28/01/2011 12:26:38 AM 761 Views
Re: Agreed. - 28/01/2011 01:48:22 AM 919 Views
Well, at least you're not disputing the nature of my claim. - 27/01/2011 10:23:24 PM 796 Views
I thought acceptance meant rejecting anything with which you're uncomfortable? - 27/01/2011 11:39:48 PM 940 Views
Don't even know what that means. - 28/01/2011 12:31:23 AM 715 Views
Actually, that first line is my problem with Universalism - 28/01/2011 01:54:00 AM 908 Views
"Carnal flesh" is redundant, you know. - 28/01/2011 04:27:30 AM 789 Views
Point of emphasis. - 28/01/2011 05:52:28 AM 891 Views
Agreed. *NM* - 28/01/2011 06:33:55 AM 428 Views
...I can't believe of the three posts, this is the only one with replies - 27/01/2011 09:48:14 PM 717 Views
I read it, if that's any consolation. *NM* - 27/01/2011 10:00:31 PM 460 Views
It is nothing new, there are always people "who protest too much" - 27/01/2011 10:26:49 PM 748 Views
TAHT'S BECAUSE IT'S GAAAAAAAAAAAAY. *NM* - 27/01/2011 11:01:15 PM 460 Views
I thought that was quite humorous - 27/01/2011 11:38:31 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message