I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means
Joel Send a noteboard - 16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM
I saw this in Doonesbury's "Say What?" section:
This has to be a tough call for the environmentalists around the world. They're scrambling now to blame this on global warming...Much of the damage seems to have happened in that part of Japan most heavily involved in manufacturing cars. So do environmentalists cheer or do they pretend to be saddened by this? It's a legitimate question.
This has to be a tough call for the environmentalists around the world. They're scrambling now to blame this on global warming...Much of the damage seems to have happened in that part of Japan most heavily involved in manufacturing cars. So do environmentalists cheer or do they pretend to be saddened by this? It's a legitimate question.
Peter King thinks terrorism against those he dislikes "legitimate" and Limbaugh thinks a question about invented allegations are; ah, rhetoric....
Exactly what events in Japan does he think environmentalists are "scrambling" to blame on global warming? The earthquake? The tsunami? The worsening dangers at the nuclear power plant? Which environmentalists are involved in his "scramble"; does he have any examples or did he just pull that out of his ample posterior? THOSE are legitimate questions. Accusing foes of a position they haven't taken just to rhetorically ask which reprehensible (and imaginary) choice they'll make is an ILlegitimate question, by definition, little more than slander (we all know Rushs feelings on THAT.
)
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
This message last edited by Joel on 16/03/2011 at 07:04:58 PM
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on?
- 16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM
1013 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president
- 16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM
979 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM
733 Views
Tsunami and climate change
- 17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM
969 Views
"Speakers were careful to point out that many findings still amounted only to hypotheses"
- 18/03/2011 01:31:44 PM
875 Views
Re: No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 18/03/2011 12:25:01 PM
913 Views
Republican spin doctor Frank Luntz popularized "climate change" to make global warming appealing.
- 18/03/2011 01:56:01 PM
816 Views
A slightly misleading post
- 16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM
832 Views
Kind of missed the point there
- 16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM
834 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM
703 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM
835 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM
850 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM
680 Views
I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM
846 Views
Re: I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM
749 Views
You need to reread what I said
- 16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM
719 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point
- 16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM
801 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it".
- 16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM
778 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means
- 16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM
887 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush
- 16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM
796 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did.
- 16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM
719 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it
- 16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM
801 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it.
- 16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM
781 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard
- 16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM
728 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe.
- 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
840 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be
- 16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM
744 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright
- 16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM
910 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done
- 16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM
779 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless.
- 16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM
853 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters
- 17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM
751 Views
Yes: It makes it worse.
- 17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM
740 Views
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally
- 17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
774 Views
At best, it shows he was joking about something he believes to be fact despite lacking evidence.
- 18/03/2011 02:24:45 PM
847 Views
so you finally agre that the context changes the meaning, took you long enough
- 18/03/2011 02:33:41 PM
729 Views