Yes, that is the correct transcript, and I see you definitely got that point about how it should be included with the original post or people's view points are skewed going into it.
I see nothing in the broader context that changes how I first read the quote as a stand alone quote, it just confirms my reading of it.
which also makes me think my reading of your first post is right - you could have posted a link to the transcript to start with but opted not to and instead posted in a misleading fashion about an "environmentalist"
*MySmiley*
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
Robert Graves "There is no money in poetry, but then there is no poetry in money, either."
Henning Mankell "We must defend the open society, because if we start locking our doors, if we let fear decide, the person who committed the act of terror will win"
So, how many drugs is Rush Limbaugh actually on?
- 16/03/2011 08:30:25 AM
995 Views
Possibly different ones then the EESC president
- 16/03/2011 03:58:41 PM
956 Views
No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 16/03/2011 04:22:52 PM
706 Views
Tsunami and climate change
- 17/03/2011 11:59:36 PM
949 Views
"Speakers were careful to point out that many findings still amounted only to hypotheses"
- 18/03/2011 01:31:44 PM
855 Views
Re: No one's blaming the earthquake or tsunami on global warming.
- 18/03/2011 12:25:01 PM
890 Views
Republican spin doctor Frank Luntz popularized "climate change" to make global warming appealing.
- 18/03/2011 01:56:01 PM
793 Views
A slightly misleading post
- 16/03/2011 07:41:46 PM
808 Views
Kind of missed the point there
- 16/03/2011 09:54:35 PM
812 Views
If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:16:21 PM
681 Views
Re: If you link the transcript I'll look at it.
- 16/03/2011 10:44:56 PM
811 Views
" I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:10:11 PM
826 Views
Re: " I can't help attaching, you know, political reaction to this". Yeah, we noticed....
- 16/03/2011 11:42:29 PM
656 Views
I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:34:41 PM
829 Views
Re: I've read the transcript
- 16/03/2011 10:46:42 PM
731 Views
You need to reread what I said
- 16/03/2011 10:49:45 PM
698 Views
No, I think you're still missing my point
- 16/03/2011 11:09:04 PM
776 Views
No. You don't get to say, "what he said doesn't matter because of how we learned of it".
- 16/03/2011 11:54:46 PM
759 Views
I think Republicans should stop using "legitimate". I do not think it means what they think it means
- 16/03/2011 04:11:14 PM
868 Views
there are enough carzies on the left to make things like this easy for Rush
- 16/03/2011 04:20:47 PM
774 Views
So it doesn't matter that no one said it as long as he can plausibly claim they did.
- 16/03/2011 06:58:17 PM
699 Views
well since it is taken out of context it is hard to say where Rush was going with it
- 16/03/2011 07:19:46 PM
784 Views
Um... he stated where he was going with it.
- 16/03/2011 07:30:02 PM
759 Views
At least you are not ashamed to use a double standard
- 16/03/2011 08:17:39 PM
710 Views
It's the same standard, whatever you choose to believe.
- 16/03/2011 09:08:01 PM
823 Views
I don't thinkit is as clear as you make it out to be
- 16/03/2011 09:31:53 PM
724 Views
It is not just "possible" he's talking about islands affected by global warming; he says it outright
- 16/03/2011 10:09:16 PM
895 Views
Sorry but I still fail to see how the islands he mention are a sign of what needs to be done
- 16/03/2011 10:27:20 PM
761 Views
Then you don't understand context and this whole discussion is pointless.
- 16/03/2011 11:28:47 PM
836 Views
lets throw a little context at asnd see if it matters
- 17/03/2011 12:12:03 AM
729 Views
Yes: It makes it worse.
- 17/03/2011 12:45:12 AM
723 Views
no it shows that the one statements was not meant to be taken literally
- 17/03/2011 02:47:55 AM
753 Views
At best, it shows he was joking about something he believes to be fact despite lacking evidence.
- 18/03/2011 02:24:45 PM
827 Views
so you finally agre that the context changes the meaning, took you long enough
- 18/03/2011 02:33:41 PM
706 Views

