Active Users:534 Time:22/12/2025 07:39:15 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom Send a noteboard - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM
I'm not sure what spreadsheet you were looking at but those numbers are so far out of the ballpark as to be prima facie suspect.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
How can anyone seriously support Obama's budget proposals? Tom - 14/04/2011 02:49:30 PM 1239 Views
I agree with your overall point but I do question one of your facts random thoughts - 14/04/2011 03:25:25 PM 705 Views
Using IRS data for 2008: (most recent year for which data is available) Macharius - 14/04/2011 03:45:20 PM 730 Views
those numbers sem high. What is your source? *NM* random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:05:26 PM 275 Views
You didn't interpret the spreadsheet correctly. I'm positive of that. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:08:39 PM 593 Views
I'm gonna have to jump on board the wagon with that being a bad figure, got some others Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:33:14 PM 780 Views
Some other income data for historical perspective, again CBO Isaac - 14/04/2011 07:45:13 PM 695 Views
Data: http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/08in31mt.xls *NM* Macharius - 14/04/2011 08:32:42 PM 289 Views
That's a breakdown of who modifies their returns and how it affects revenue. Tom - 14/04/2011 09:15:21 PM 552 Views
I see. Well, nevermind then. *NM* Macharius - 15/04/2011 01:37:13 PM 277 Views
I believe you are questioning one of my definitions, not one of my facts. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:36:35 PM 648 Views
No matter how you define it I think it would be hard to call the top 5% middle class random thoughts - 14/04/2011 05:03:33 PM 660 Views
A family making $150,000 is not middle class? Tom - 14/04/2011 06:07:07 PM 666 Views
reading what you said again random thoughts - 14/04/2011 06:37:54 PM 620 Views
What a load of crap! Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 03:49:29 PM 776 Views
Yes, your response is a load of crap. Tom - 14/04/2011 04:55:20 PM 732 Views
Re: Yes, your response is a load of crap. Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:13:14 PM 784 Views
This is our first war without a tax increase. Tom - 14/04/2011 06:05:43 PM 701 Views
"Artful Dodgers" Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 06:30:58 PM 655 Views
Not giving me the information I need Tom - 14/04/2011 09:33:36 PM 632 Views
Er, check facts Isaac - 14/04/2011 05:04:02 PM 850 Views
Yeah, lets fact check Skeeve the Great - 14/04/2011 05:43:34 PM 712 Views
You understand you're actually supposed to cite data for a fact check right? Isaac - 14/04/2011 06:38:22 PM 855 Views
I'm not sure thats entirely right MalkierKnight - 14/04/2011 05:51:18 PM 946 Views
You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? Tom - 14/04/2011 05:56:08 PM 650 Views
Re: You basically just said what I said. How am I not right? MalkierKnight - 15/04/2011 02:48:07 AM 826 Views
A response Roland00 - 14/04/2011 06:33:49 PM 768 Views
I only have one thing to ask. callandor1000 - 15/04/2011 02:36:07 PM 621 Views
What about the farm subsidies and the military? Vivien - 15/04/2011 04:54:54 PM 639 Views
Re: What about the farm subsidies and the military? Skeeve the Great - 15/04/2011 08:21:16 PM 627 Views
Cutting the military isn't enough Roland00 - 16/04/2011 04:27:11 AM 619 Views
Defense is 60% of the discretionary budget as well, so it's more like 26% overall. Just sayin'. *NM* Ghavrel - 16/04/2011 04:53:30 AM 298 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes