Active Users:335 Time:05/05/2024 05:11:31 PM
By giving... its legal definition in the UK! (At least for the purposes of the Equality Act.) Tim Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 08:51:58 AM
We in the United States at least recognize that race and nationality are two separate things. This is the reason you see words to the effect that discrimination should not be based on "race, religion, color, sex, age, handicap, national origin, veteran status, marital status, pregnancy, maternity, or sexual orientation" (to quote from a standard employment clause).


Obviously they are not exactly the same thing. If we thought they were, that interpretation subsection wouldn't have been necessary at all – it would have just said "race" and expected everyone to take that as including ethnic origin and nationality.

But in reality they overlap to a large extent, and if you're going to have an anti-discrimination law, it's convenient to lump them together. Otherwise you get stupid arguments like "The reason I refused to let that man stay in my hotel wasn't because he's black. It's because I don't serve Nigerians, Ghanaians, Kenyans... it's their nationality I have a problem with". Also, anti-English racism in Scotland (which is a very real problem, possibly worse than against any non-white group here) wouldn't then be covered. Ditto antagonism between Indians and Pakistanis.

Different words are defined differently in different enactments. Basically what they're doing is saving themselves having to type out "racial, ethnic or national origins" every single time it comes up. Since the Act treats all those characteristics in the same way, it makes sense to refer to them with a single term. "Ethnicity" or "national origins" would have done just as well, as long as they were defined equally inclusively. "Race" just has the advantage of being shorter.

Nationality is one's nationality, a legal status. Ask someone to produce a passport and you will have their nationality. This is what makes a Chechen a "Russian" or an Afrikaaner a "South African".

Race is one's race. It is what makes a Chechen NOT a Russian, and an Afrikaaner NOT an "African". It is what makes me European, even though I was born in America, and what makes my friend Asian, even though he was also born in America.

Color is color. It is essentially tied to race these days, since people don't like saying "yellow, red and brown" though black and white are still in common parlance.


Obviously I know all three of these things. My point is that if you're being discriminatory towards people, it doesn't matter which of them is your grounds – all three are equally bad. (I'm going to leave aside immigration issues for now so as not to complicate things.) So we might as well use one name for it.

Now, as for the rest of your comment, I am in complete agreement.


Glad to hear it.
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
I have never EVER met kids this horrible - 15/04/2011 05:14:06 AM 1504 Views
slapping might make him sillier? Sounds like the parents would enjoy that too? *NM* - 15/04/2011 05:25:38 AM 312 Views
no the parents dont wanna hear anyhting about their kid - 15/04/2011 05:30:00 AM 528 Views
Good for you. That's definitely the way to do it. *NM* - 17/04/2011 12:14:30 AM 207 Views
Welcome to children in a world run by liberals. *NM* - 15/04/2011 05:51:46 AM 249 Views
BS *NM* - 15/04/2011 06:24:48 AM 242 Views
I am gonna beat my childrens asses raw if they ever act like that *NM* - 15/04/2011 06:25:54 AM 229 Views
I'll beat your ass raw, baby. *NM* - 15/04/2011 06:49:09 AM 237 Views
that has nothing to do with it. - 15/04/2011 06:28:14 AM 556 Views
Sounds dreadful - 15/04/2011 06:27:41 AM 532 Views
you guys have no effing clue - 15/04/2011 06:32:52 AM 506 Views
That sounds extremely annoying. But less of the racism, if you don't mind. - 15/04/2011 10:11:09 AM 505 Views
they are paki british if it helps *NM* - 15/04/2011 04:11:39 PM 249 Views
... *NM* - 15/04/2011 04:21:24 PM 235 Views
Re: Pretty much my reaction. - 15/04/2011 07:26:22 PM 538 Views
"Paki" is used self-referentially in the States without being a slur. Cool your jets. - 15/04/2011 08:07:26 PM 737 Views
Wait, what? - 15/04/2011 08:12:34 PM 595 Views
SILVER ON THE TREE. Bullies are tormenting a Sikh child on a bridge. - 15/04/2011 08:40:46 PM 449 Views
Ah, must be why I don't remember it - 16/04/2011 06:23:30 AM 461 Views
The Riders were so freaking awesome/scary. *NM* - 16/04/2011 06:39:35 AM 205 Views
Re: Why would you think that you know it's a slur in the UK, but I wouldn't? - 15/04/2011 08:47:50 PM 463 Views
I was talking about Aisha, not you. I don't know where you live--I thought you were European. - 15/04/2011 09:51:10 PM 504 Views
Re: Just to point out: - 16/04/2011 01:28:01 AM 473 Views
Am I the only one who sees a difference in this? - 16/04/2011 01:49:49 AM 615 Views
You are correct. Your interlocutors are stupid. *NM* - 16/04/2011 02:25:56 AM 262 Views
Obviously killing people is worse than calling them names. - 16/04/2011 08:29:22 AM 471 Views
Re: I'm pretty sure it was me... - 16/04/2011 02:46:57 PM 437 Views
G/J? *NM* - 17/04/2011 01:27:02 AM 243 Views
Umm...Not by the Pakistanis in VT - 16/04/2011 11:30:10 PM 424 Views
Interesting. I have not seen that here. *NM* - 16/04/2011 11:50:27 PM 186 Views
Much less than you'd think, given that is considered racist over here in the UK unlike the US. *NM* - 15/04/2011 04:26:54 PM 189 Views
Even aside from the use of the word "Paki"... - 15/04/2011 07:36:41 PM 434 Views
Well, they aren't racially British, so "anti-British racism" is by definition inapplicable here. - 15/04/2011 08:04:36 PM 497 Views
... *NM* - 15/04/2011 08:23:07 PM 273 Views
New Zealand doesn't count. - 15/04/2011 08:36:58 PM 496 Views
Methinks you have a rather narrow definition of "race". - 15/04/2011 11:14:51 PM 700 Views
I disagree. - 15/04/2011 11:34:44 PM 508 Views
No, you just distorted the word "race" out of all recognition for legal definition purposes. - 16/04/2011 12:39:26 AM 438 Views
Does the existence of a British race even exist by that definition? *NM* - 16/04/2011 01:44:38 AM 194 Views
No, it doesn't. - 16/04/2011 03:25:00 AM 452 Views
By giving... its legal definition in the UK! (At least for the purposes of the Equality Act.) - 16/04/2011 08:51:58 AM 595 Views
I don't understand why you're so upset about this. - 16/04/2011 03:34:23 AM 447 Views
I'm not really. - 16/04/2011 08:26:55 AM 531 Views
Bad Tim! - 16/04/2011 08:36:51 PM 513 Views
Re: You do know you're getting no cookies for this line of discussion. *NM* - 17/04/2011 01:31:24 AM 301 Views
My two-year-old knows enough to say "thank you". - 15/04/2011 04:37:23 PM 458 Views
Re: My two-year-old knows enough to say "thank you". - 15/04/2011 04:59:16 PM 553 Views
Aww your baby sounds adorable! - 15/04/2011 08:15:22 PM 492 Views
Yeah, thats how I greet friends of the family to *NM* - 16/04/2011 12:07:47 AM 178 Views
Lucky you. - 15/04/2011 04:40:41 PM 527 Views
The parents seem to be the problem more than the child - 15/04/2011 06:15:08 PM 522 Views
Yeah, My kid would also be in trouble if he behaved this way. - 15/04/2011 08:13:50 PM 467 Views

Reply to Message