Re: Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 16/04/2011 10:47:24 PM
Let me summarize one last time and then I am done:
3 tax cuts, tax revenue increased all 3 times
3 tax cuts, tax revenue increased all 3 times
And as it was pointed out to you it's a bullsh!t because you are not taking in account population grows and inflation. If you do, and calculate revenur per capita (I hope you understand what it means) than you see the other effect - each time you cut taxes revenue decreases.
Several basics facts about US Debt and Spending.....
- 16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
1297 Views
- 16/04/2011 04:41:55 AM
1297 Views
Guess we should have okay'd those death panels for old people then. Big money saver.
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
425 Views
*NM*
- 16/04/2011 03:38:00 PM
425 Views
Balancing our budget would be easy.
- 16/04/2011 06:46:32 PM
764 Views
Several of those aren't as easy as you make it sound, but the import tax is a big no-no.
- 16/04/2011 07:34:30 PM
978 Views
Also on the buying drugs from Canada idea
- 16/04/2011 08:17:26 PM
860 Views
Funny you mentioned WWII and 1968. Can you put tax rates at these times as well?
- 16/04/2011 07:50:09 PM
1234 Views
Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains. *NM*
- 16/04/2011 08:25:26 PM
364 Views
Re: Not really. Even if you can substantially raise tax revenue, the entitlement problem remains.
- 16/04/2011 09:19:40 PM
893 Views
Have you ever looked at those projections for a decade or two hence?
- 16/04/2011 10:13:12 PM
858 Views
Yes I have
- 16/04/2011 10:44:50 PM
987 Views
Erm, and you think total health care spending is not getting out of control? I'm a little confused.
- 16/04/2011 11:02:52 PM
921 Views
Exactly. Cutting back on fraud and waste doesn't really put much of a dent in those projections. *NM*
- 17/04/2011 02:31:13 AM
344 Views
Sorry, but that is a stupid opinion.....
- 16/04/2011 08:38:35 PM
824 Views
Sounds like another bull.
- 16/04/2011 09:31:05 PM
1074 Views
Dude, the data is the data.....tax revenue increased all three times.
- 16/04/2011 09:47:37 PM
1048 Views
As I suspected, it's a bull.
- 16/04/2011 10:02:05 PM
959 Views
Stop being a fool - read and react to the data provided, posting something.....
- 16/04/2011 10:14:11 PM
712 Views
Response is
- 16/04/2011 10:19:00 PM
927 Views
Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
- 16/04/2011 10:28:44 PM
932 Views
Re: Good lord.....it's like talking to a brick. I really hope you are 12 or 13.
- 16/04/2011 10:47:24 PM
888 Views
I take it you mean "rate of revenue growth decreases".
- 16/04/2011 11:11:19 PM
813 Views
It's not remarkable that revenue increased after the Reagan cuts.
- 17/04/2011 07:21:47 PM
1119 Views
I've just noticed that you've provided charts from Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me?
- 16/04/2011 10:13:46 PM
803 Views
All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
- 16/04/2011 10:16:08 PM
818 Views
Re: All the data is via CBO - do you know that the CBO is?
- 16/04/2011 10:27:01 PM
928 Views
Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
- 16/04/2011 10:35:44 PM
746 Views
Re: Nice try.....care to explain why the same exact thing happened.....
- 16/04/2011 10:49:33 PM
899 Views
Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
- 17/04/2011 02:34:50 AM
760 Views
Re: Krugman is a shill for the Obama administration.
- 17/04/2011 03:50:24 AM
981 Views
Some obesrvations by Republican economists
- 18/04/2011 12:27:04 AM
1121 Views
You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
- 18/04/2011 04:00:52 PM
761 Views
Re: You mean the Keynesian economist who wrote The Failure of Reaganomics
- 18/04/2011 05:36:44 PM
747 Views
You use Krugman and then complain about the Heritage Foundation! Are you f.. kidding me? *NM*
- 18/04/2011 02:46:47 AM
380 Views


