try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it
random thoughts Send a noteboard - 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM
The fourth amendment gives you the right to not be searched or have your property searched or taken without proper legal justification. Being followed either electronically or in person does neither of those things. There is no difference in the knowledge they would gain between following physically or electronically so there should be no difference it in your expectation of privacy.
secret GPS tracking upheld as legal practice
- 16/05/2011 02:37:14 PM
917 Views
How do they expect honest criminals to make a living with rules like this?
- 16/05/2011 06:24:45 PM
533 Views
sure this example is about convicted robbers
- 16/05/2011 06:42:51 PM
493 Views
I will have a problem when I see innocent people being targeted for no reason
- 16/05/2011 09:17:22 PM
492 Views
so get a warrant if these guys are such threats to society
- 17/05/2011 12:57:51 AM
486 Views
once again privacy takes place in private not in public. That is sorta where the word comes from
- 17/05/2011 02:23:05 PM
497 Views
the constitution guarantees the right of privacy to all, not just law abiding citizens
- 16/05/2011 09:14:24 PM
492 Views
where does it say that? It should be real easy to point to since it is in the constiution
- 16/05/2011 09:21:19 PM
544 Views
4th amendment
- 17/05/2011 12:55:00 AM
534 Views
Re: 4th amendment
- 17/05/2011 03:13:13 AM
494 Views
Re: 4th amendment
- 17/05/2011 03:28:36 AM
521 Views
Re: 4th amendment
- 17/05/2011 03:58:49 AM
491 Views
try reading it again it doesn't have the word privacy in it
- 17/05/2011 02:42:44 PM
507 Views
how is surveillance not a type of search? *NM*
- 17/05/2011 09:25:27 PM
250 Views
*NM*
how is different if it is done by GPS or tailing them in a car? *NM*
- 17/05/2011 10:00:53 PM
202 Views
it's not different -- if they get a warrant first
- 18/05/2011 01:50:13 AM
502 Views
*NM*