Active Users:644 Time:17/03/2026 03:59:40 PM
just a guess but random thoughts Send a noteboard - 08/06/2011 11:40:44 PM
I assume they are saying would be allowable to make purchasing insurance a condition for being treated. They could probably even force them to sign a contract for and extended amount insurance not just sell them insurance to cover this one visit. They would not be violating their constitutional rights if they said pay us what it will cost or sign this contract for five years worth of insurance. The patient would then being making a choice to buy insurance or not be treated.
Reply to message
ObamaCare's Legal Death Spiral Continues.....great news for America! - 08/06/2011 10:04:24 PM 1064 Views
I'm not informed enough to comment on most of this, but can someone explain that last line to me? - 08/06/2011 11:25:49 PM 673 Views
just a guess but - 08/06/2011 11:40:44 PM 560 Views
Yeah, and I guess that's what I was missing (see my response to Tom). - 09/06/2011 07:13:00 AM 549 Views
keep in mind it is a legal argument - 09/06/2011 01:50:05 PM 531 Views
It's incredibly different. - 09/06/2011 03:03:07 AM 571 Views
Well. . .sort of. - 09/06/2011 07:00:30 AM 711 Views
"...the government mandate to have health insurance was unlike any law in American history"... - 09/06/2011 05:24:56 AM 552 Views
wait.... - 09/06/2011 04:34:13 PM 598 Views
+1 - apples and oranges here..... *NM* - 09/06/2011 05:38:40 PM 210 Views
Re: wait.... - 10/06/2011 02:36:33 AM 530 Views
if you want to opt out just work for a local government - 09/06/2011 06:01:06 PM 526 Views
Local government employees don't pay FICA? Where? - 10/06/2011 12:03:49 AM 536 Views
Actually, there's an even more relevant example. - 09/06/2011 08:01:18 PM 656 Views
That's a very flawed example - 09/06/2011 09:06:24 PM 537 Views
Excellent response.....you hit the nail on the head..... *NM* - 09/06/2011 09:12:06 PM 232 Views

Reply to Message