Active Users:1497 Time:01/07/2025 12:29:45 PM
Re: A first responce Camilla Send a noteboard - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM
This is something that started bugging me after a random association yesterday. John the Baptist. On whose authority was he baptising people? No one had died for people's sins yet. From what I understand baptism functions in connection with that. Have I misunderstood something?

And why did Jesus need to be baptised?

I am genuinely curious about the doctrinal reasoning here. It has been a while since I studied these things and for the life of me I cannot remember anything about it. I know that there were several Jewish groups that practised baptism at the time, but I do not know the intra-Christian reasoning for this event.

As a theologian I must say I havn't been doing a lot of research after this, but the first thing I would say would be that whatever view on baptism christians have today (there are some differences on the precise theological importance between Roman Catholics, Reformed (Calvinistic), Lutheran and Baptist churches), it is clear for most people that John the Baptist baptized in a different way.

He basically told people to start living more holy, according to the law of Moses, with a huge emphasis on simply being "honest" (he didn't appear to have a well thought-out ethical system).

As an outward sign of this new way of living, this change of lifestyle, a baptism was mainly focused leaving the past behind and living better lives now. There was probably only a limited theory of salvation involved.

Why Jesus? Noone can probably give a full answer, only that it was "fitting" so that "all righteousness be fulfulled" (Mat.3:15). What all of that involves may take a few years to study, but that was Jesus' answer anyway.


Well, it is comforting to know that I had not forgotten something major and obvious. Considering the centrality of baptism in most Christian denomination, however, I am surprised that this is not more of an issue.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 952 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 697 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 538 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 516 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 609 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 542 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 502 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 537 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 481 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 541 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 511 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 654 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 511 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 713 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 716 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 519 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 544 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 411 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 477 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 603 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 665 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 227 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 470 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 642 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 580 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 667 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 269 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 708 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 695 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 607 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 681 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 549 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 639 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 730 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 547 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 662 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 495 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 518 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 593 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 672 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 633 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 895 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 534 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 586 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 859 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 713 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 710 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 250 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 217 Views

Reply to Message