Re: They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
Camilla Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 11:53:53 AM
It's pretty widely held, though, that in order to qualify for salvation one must first be baptized. It kind of gets you in the door, so to speak.
And baptism does involve a confession and repentance of sin.
Anyway, I'm pretty sure they gave up on Limbo a while ago.
Babies automatically qualify for salvation?
Accountability is generally accepted to be conditional on awareness and consent, and infants are capable of neither. I also like pointing to the Israelites forty years in the wilderness: The biblical basis is that, because the Israelites refused to enter Canaan when spies reported the natives apparent military supremacy, God decreed that none of them would EVER be allowed to enter, but would instead wander the wilderness until everyone above age twenty had died. What's interesting about that is that it means the Bible states God held the entire Israelite nation responsible for doubting Him and forbade them to ever enter Canaan BUT explicitly excused everyone under the age of consent. In essence, minors got a free pass. It could be argued that was because they had no say in whether to invade (notwithstanding the fact many of them would have been expected to participate), but I trust you see why I consider the incident a kind of precedent, or at least illustration of a principle.
How does that work together with original sin?
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
structured procrastinator
A question on baptism
10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM
- 967 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection.
10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM
- 712 Views
What I meant
10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM
- 556 Views
I don't follow.
10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM
- 535 Views
Re: I don't follow.
10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM
- 626 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much.
10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM
- 561 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much.
10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM
- 522 Views
They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
11/06/2011 10:39:26 AM
- 622 Views
Re: They should, IMHO, but the difficulty of definitively saying is why Limbo was created.
11/06/2011 11:53:53 AM
- 548 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM
- 556 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM
- 498 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM
- 559 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM
- 525 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM
- 674 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM
- 527 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM
- 734 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM
- 730 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM
- 536 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression.
10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM
- 559 Views
Circumcision remains common among Christians mostly for symbolic reasons as well.
11/06/2011 10:48:48 AM
- 613 Views
Hm, I don't know. I don't think I know any non-Jews who are circumsized that see it as a symbol
11/06/2011 04:44:02 PM
- 694 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges
10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM
- 625 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity
10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM
- 660 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason
10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM
- 597 Views
A first responce
10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM
- 726 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one?
10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM
- 697 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical
10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM
- 567 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water
10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM
- 653 Views
That is absurd.
10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM
- 747 Views
It is absurd
10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM
- 565 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move.
10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM
- 677 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water"
11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM
- 519 Views
The point is that it's a symbol.
11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM
- 537 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol
11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM
- 604 Views
You are totally missing the point.
11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM
- 690 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense
11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM
- 653 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion
11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM
- 924 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean"
11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM
- 548 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical.
11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM
- 603 Views
Shrug. It was on topic.
11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM
- 873 Views
The more I read of your posts, the more I think you fundamentally misunderstand religious symbolism. *NM*
11/06/2011 10:51:17 PM
- 237 Views
Let me clarify: your statements are absurd.
10/06/2011 10:14:06 PM
- 572 Views
Check my response to Ghav for elaboration, but basically, your argument doesn't hold
11/06/2011 04:00:18 AM
- 556 Views
You went from saying spit was good to saying "clean water".
12/06/2011 02:04:26 AM
- 499 Views
I'm completely consistent. I was just staying away from extremes for conversation's sake.
12/06/2011 09:02:02 AM
- 534 Views
No one from a respectable faith thinks of holy water as "magic water". Period. *NM*
13/06/2011 04:56:53 AM
- 234 Views
All I know, Is a Lutheran Pastor told me, b/c i was not baptised I was going to hell, and had *NM*
11/06/2011 03:44:38 PM
- 212 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site
*NM*
12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM
- 254 Views
