Active Users:410 Time:01/07/2025 10:26:38 PM
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" beetnemesis Send a noteboard - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM
In some religions. Not psychologically so, but literally. As in, if you touch this pig/blood/woman, you are actually, spiritually unclean. It's not a state of mind, it's spiritual cause and effect. Logic.*

Christianity, for the most part, doesn't have much of that (of course, that's not counting those creepy little reliquaries filled with the knucklebones of saints, but I digress).


Most of the time, Christianity is simply about belief, without any sort of magical accessories. So, a woman who was praying for her sick child on her knees in a closet would be no less likely to have her prayers answered than if she was doing it holding a diamond-studded crucifix, surrounded by scented oils. As long as the belief is there, you're good.



The issue I had with holy water is that, despite whatever justifications people come up with, it is basically treated as "magic water." If you touch it, you are blessed. If you use it in your baptism, that's better than regular water. It can be used to ward off attacks from demons (I'm not being facetious, the idea that holy water can ward off evil is definitely a part of the perception of holy water, even if it's not one that comes up often during a sermon).




But it's not ABOUT THAT. It is entirely psychological. It's placebo. It's feel-good.


And that would be fine, if that's how it was treated. However, when a priest blesses water, he's not thinking "Ah, I'll wave my hands over this water, that'll make the flock feel better." No, he's thinking "Oh Lord, please bless this water."


Holy water is treated as magical water, even though we all seem to be in consensus that it is, at best, a symbol. That's what bugs me about holy water.





*I'll take a moment here to talk about using logic to talk about religion. At first it sounds absurd, but if you approach it the same way you talk about logic in, say, Wheel of Time (or any other fantasy novel, for that matter), it works out pretty well. Both religions and fantasy books have their own internal logic that their world follows. Both are always unable to get it right 100% of the time, so there are always going to be some inconsistencies. That shouldn't stop people from enjoying the Dresden Files/the Bible, but I hope it does stop people from always assuming every single word put down is, heh, gospel.


(An added bonus is that it really irritates a certain type of person when you compare their holy book to the Dresden Files)
I amuse myself.
Reply to message
A question on baptism - 10/06/2011 09:21:44 AM 954 Views
To my knowledge, baptism does not stem from the Resurrection. - 10/06/2011 11:01:17 AM 699 Views
What I meant - 10/06/2011 11:03:08 AM 541 Views
I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:08:07 AM 518 Views
Re: I don't follow. - 10/06/2011 11:10:40 AM 610 Views
I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:15:52 AM 544 Views
Re: I don't keep up with RC theology much. - 10/06/2011 11:17:53 AM 503 Views
You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:50:53 AM 537 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:52:27 AM 481 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:55:01 AM 542 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 11:58:36 AM 512 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:16:46 PM 656 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:19:16 PM 513 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:25:08 PM 715 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:26:30 PM 718 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:28:45 PM 521 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:29:43 PM 545 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:33:01 PM 411 Views
Re: You haven't necessarily developed a wrong impression. - 10/06/2011 12:34:36 PM 477 Views
I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:48:26 AM 606 Views
Re: I took a holy dip into the Ganges - 10/06/2011 11:54:17 AM 668 Views
He dances and dips in The Ganges- Very Nice. *NM* - 11/06/2011 02:15:41 AM 228 Views
Three dips - that's the ceremony. - 11/06/2011 02:35:43 AM 472 Views
Early Christians and Jews were obsessed with purity - 10/06/2011 12:56:58 PM 644 Views
Oh, I know about the historical/academic/anthropological reason - 10/06/2011 01:04:43 PM 582 Views
I misunderstood, lets try again - 10/06/2011 01:44:43 PM 668 Views
Huh. *NM* - 10/06/2011 02:06:58 PM 269 Views
A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:09:32 PM 711 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:15:07 PM 697 Views
Re: A first responce - 10/06/2011 02:19:25 PM 610 Views
Do you want a theological answer or a historical one? - 10/06/2011 03:16:44 PM 682 Views
The theological. I already had a fairly good idea of the historical - 10/06/2011 03:18:51 PM 551 Views
My favorite fact about baptism is that is REQUIRES water... but it can be ANY water - 10/06/2011 04:31:12 PM 642 Views
That is absurd. - 10/06/2011 08:37:13 PM 732 Views
It is absurd - 10/06/2011 08:56:19 PM 548 Views
When your post is eviscerated, resorting to "HURR RELIGION IS DUMB" isn't a winning move. - 10/06/2011 10:00:39 PM 663 Views
Psh.You can dress it up with spiritualism and semantics, but the concept boils down to "magic water" - 11/06/2011 03:56:03 AM 496 Views
The point is that it's a symbol. - 11/06/2011 04:45:19 AM 519 Views
I have no problem with water as a symbol - 11/06/2011 04:59:52 AM 593 Views
You are totally missing the point. - 11/06/2011 02:46:08 PM 674 Views
Which again, is something that sounds nice and spiritual, but doesn't actually make any sense - 11/06/2011 03:46:51 PM 636 Views
your problem is you're trying to apply objective logic to religion - 11/06/2011 04:13:01 PM 897 Views
I'm not, exactly. Religion has internal logic. For example, certain things are "unclean" - 11/06/2011 04:40:33 PM 535 Views
Beliefs about holy water are internally logical. - 11/06/2011 07:36:08 PM 588 Views
Shrug. It was on topic. - 11/06/2011 08:06:16 PM 860 Views
Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 10:23:02 AM 714 Views
Re: Baptism is almost, if not entirely, symbolic. - 11/06/2011 11:51:22 AM 713 Views
I never thought of it in that way, that is why I like this site *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:26:40 PM 251 Views
Because we are all nuts in our own special ways? *NM* - 12/06/2011 04:36:03 PM 218 Views

Reply to Message