Active Users:702 Time:12/09/2026 10:29:15 PM
Agreed. Joel Send a noteboard - 29/06/2011 10:02:43 AM
But only to expose the "it's not partisanship, it's THE CONSTITUTION111" radicals as the hypocrites they are. Again. Much good may it do us.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Not that they have a monopoly on self serving unpatriotic hypocrisy, mind you.
This message last edited by Joel on 29/06/2011 at 10:03:45 AM
Reply to message
It would amuse me to see the 14th Amendment used to side-step the debt ceiling argument - 29/06/2011 02:39:35 AM 1142 Views
Christ, Just cut spending already *NM* - 29/06/2011 03:24:07 AM 279 Views
+1 - we spend TOO MUCH DAMN MONEY.....cut, cut, cut, cut. *NM* - 29/06/2011 04:54:56 AM 246 Views
I'm curious. - 29/06/2011 06:18:12 AM 646 Views
Easy answers = Yes, No, No - 29/06/2011 01:02:58 PM 650 Views
You know, it's kinda funny. (edited with data correction) - 29/06/2011 02:07:55 PM 850 Views
... and raise taxes. - 29/06/2011 11:18:41 AM 809 Views
Absolutely NO TAX INCREASES until..... - 29/06/2011 01:04:55 PM 624 Views
Agreed. - 29/06/2011 10:02:43 AM 787 Views
Idiocy. Note the "authorized by law" clause. - 29/06/2011 02:07:24 PM 595 Views
You know.... - 29/06/2011 04:08:31 PM 666 Views
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM 844 Views

Reply to Message