Active Users:399 Time:17/09/2025 11:11:56 AM
Agreed. Joel Send a noteboard - 29/06/2011 10:02:43 AM
But only to expose the "it's not partisanship, it's THE CONSTITUTION111" radicals as the hypocrites they are. Again. Much good may it do us.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Not that they have a monopoly on self serving unpatriotic hypocrisy, mind you.
This message last edited by Joel on 29/06/2011 at 10:03:45 AM
Reply to message
It would amuse me to see the 14th Amendment used to side-step the debt ceiling argument - 29/06/2011 02:39:35 AM 1003 Views
Christ, Just cut spending already *NM* - 29/06/2011 03:24:07 AM 220 Views
+1 - we spend TOO MUCH DAMN MONEY.....cut, cut, cut, cut. *NM* - 29/06/2011 04:54:56 AM 194 Views
I'm curious. - 29/06/2011 06:18:12 AM 557 Views
Easy answers = Yes, No, No - 29/06/2011 01:02:58 PM 555 Views
You know, it's kinda funny. (edited with data correction) - 29/06/2011 02:07:55 PM 736 Views
... and raise taxes. - 29/06/2011 11:18:41 AM 694 Views
Absolutely NO TAX INCREASES until..... - 29/06/2011 01:04:55 PM 522 Views
Agreed. - 29/06/2011 10:02:43 AM 672 Views
Idiocy. Note the "authorized by law" clause. - 29/06/2011 02:07:24 PM 499 Views
You know.... - 29/06/2011 04:08:31 PM 561 Views
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM 744 Views

Reply to Message