Active Users:405 Time:08/03/2026 04:53:59 AM
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter Roland00 Send a noteboard - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM
and while it isn't a perfect comparison to the situation, I as a non-lawyer find it to be a very similar situation, so as a lawyer Tom please point to me the difference between this situation and the past supreme court case Perry v. United States (1935).


Perry v. United States (1935)
Reply to message
It would amuse me to see the 14th Amendment used to side-step the debt ceiling argument - 29/06/2011 02:39:35 AM 1058 Views
Christ, Just cut spending already *NM* - 29/06/2011 03:24:07 AM 245 Views
+1 - we spend TOO MUCH DAMN MONEY.....cut, cut, cut, cut. *NM* - 29/06/2011 04:54:56 AM 211 Views
I'm curious. - 29/06/2011 06:18:12 AM 586 Views
Easy answers = Yes, No, No - 29/06/2011 01:02:58 PM 589 Views
You know, it's kinda funny. (edited with data correction) - 29/06/2011 02:07:55 PM 783 Views
... and raise taxes. - 29/06/2011 11:18:41 AM 740 Views
Absolutely NO TAX INCREASES until..... - 29/06/2011 01:04:55 PM 565 Views
Agreed. - 29/06/2011 10:02:43 AM 716 Views
Idiocy. Note the "authorized by law" clause. - 29/06/2011 02:07:24 PM 533 Views
You know.... - 29/06/2011 04:08:31 PM 594 Views
There is a 1935 supreme court case about this matter - 01/07/2011 10:02:58 AM 783 Views

Reply to Message