It's not just about his reelection. Can you imagine having this circus again next year?
Legolas Send a noteboard - 25/07/2011 09:16:17 PM
When election fever runs even higher and the campaigning pretty much stops all serious legislative activity? As ugly as this deal may end up becoming, one shudders to think what it would be next year.
Of course, the whole "keep important business out of election years" thing worked better back in the days when serious business could be done in non-election years...
Of course, the whole "keep important business out of election years" thing worked better back in the days when serious business could be done in non-election years...
Reid/Democrats cave, Republicans win debt ceiling debate -
25/07/2011 07:29:17 PM
- 1130 Views

Why must it always be us against them
25/07/2011 08:12:48 PM
- 633 Views
Two-party system = us vs. them
25/07/2011 09:00:31 PM
- 620 Views
fuck you
26/07/2011 03:17:04 AM
- 695 Views
HA! HA! - I think I broke moondog's mind.....
26/07/2011 04:09:59 AM
- 606 Views
it's not about support, it's about getting *some* of what you want
26/07/2011 06:31:26 AM
- 624 Views
I am only getting "some" of what I want.....
26/07/2011 03:01:28 PM
- 751 Views
when your position is intractable, don't be surprised when people refuse to work with you
26/07/2011 03:55:28 PM
- 603 Views
It generally isn't
25/07/2011 09:30:36 PM
- 657 Views
It formerly wasn't.
25/07/2011 10:22:47 PM
- 691 Views
That's mostly BS
26/07/2011 12:57:26 AM
- 741 Views
Boehner was onboard with Obamas initial deal but cited his caucus as the reason he backed out of it.
26/07/2011 01:39:06 AM
- 821 Views
I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal?
26/07/2011 03:11:40 AM
- 643 Views
Re: I'm sorry, did I mention Boehner in my message somewhere? Or the deal?
29/07/2011 08:26:12 AM
- 800 Views
Is there some lack of understanding about 'tangent' maybe?
30/07/2011 04:57:15 AM
- 679 Views
Not at all; you stated exactly why I wasn't being tangential.
30/07/2011 12:47:08 PM
- 588 Views
You're making overtly contradictory statements now, so I think we're done
31/07/2011 01:57:37 AM
- 614 Views
It's not just about his reelection. Can you imagine having this circus again next year?
25/07/2011 09:16:17 PM
- 660 Views
or he is worried that with and election coming more dems will break ranks
25/07/2011 10:00:56 PM
- 593 Views
Yeah, pretty much.
25/07/2011 10:12:03 PM
- 835 Views
Reid didn't cave as much as you might think
25/07/2011 11:58:08 PM
- 615 Views
I agree with that.
25/07/2011 11:59:41 PM
- 641 Views
to bad we have a media more interested in hyping the drama than they are in cutting through BS
26/07/2011 01:42:39 AM
- 624 Views
we need a law like they have in canada that you can't lie during a newscast
26/07/2011 03:58:38 PM
- 631 Views
Yeah, but any tax hikes, and any Dem leverage, is gone now.
26/07/2011 01:51:04 AM
- 791 Views
the tax cuts are set to expire on their own, they don't need to vote to cancel them.
26/07/2011 02:04:58 PM
- 554 Views
Yes, but they voted to extend them last winter, which you insist was the Dems fault.
27/07/2011 03:30:33 AM
- 647 Views