Active Users:342 Time:17/06/2025 06:20:59 PM
I did read it Larry Send a noteboard - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM
At least, for removing some of that.

Because the project is joint US-Brazilian, and the English "dictionary" of 45 000 words is meant to be mirrored by the Brazilian version that will come out soon, they removed lots of words that would look like false friends in Portuguese. They also removed a lot of other words for different reasons.

I agree that it will be on the low side for your actual vocabulary.


I wonder how I'd do with the Brazilian Portuguese vocabulary. Probably in the low thousands.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Help out these researchers: test your English vocabulary - 21/08/2011 03:07:24 PM 765 Views
I tried to be very conservative - 21/08/2011 04:55:08 PM 550 Views
That was my thought as well - 21/08/2011 06:24:06 PM 584 Views
Indeed. If you read their explanation, however, there's a decent reason for that. - 21/08/2011 06:27:34 PM 520 Views
I did read it - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM 444 Views
28,300 words. - 21/08/2011 05:52:10 PM 490 Views
Hmm - 21/08/2011 06:07:36 PM 539 Views
I got 35700, but I was perhaps too generous in ticking boxes. - 21/08/2011 07:49:24 PM 599 Views
The wife had the same reaction to "lots", "somewhat" and "not much". - 21/08/2011 10:15:05 PM 565 Views
Yeah, she would. - 21/08/2011 10:54:20 PM 505 Views
That makes sense. - 22/08/2011 03:49:18 PM 566 Views
I'm going to hope I misinterpreted that, but... - 22/08/2011 07:24:04 PM 484 Views
Nah, you got it, and I didn't. - 22/08/2011 08:27:33 PM 543 Views
37700 *NM* - 21/08/2011 08:52:29 PM 192 Views
Bah, 35,000 *NM* - 21/08/2011 10:02:43 PM 213 Views
I'm only slightly above average - 22/08/2011 04:07:02 AM 472 Views
39,000. It seemed pretty heavy on the Latin derivations. *NM* - 22/08/2011 04:48:23 AM 221 Views
28,800 - 22/08/2011 01:43:36 PM 477 Views
Trollop! Trollop was on the list! Low- 22,800. *NM* - 22/08/2011 08:43:21 PM 207 Views

Reply to Message