Active Users:496 Time:13/12/2025 10:36:36 PM
I did read it Larry Send a noteboard - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM
At least, for removing some of that.

Because the project is joint US-Brazilian, and the English "dictionary" of 45 000 words is meant to be mirrored by the Brazilian version that will come out soon, they removed lots of words that would look like false friends in Portuguese. They also removed a lot of other words for different reasons.

I agree that it will be on the low side for your actual vocabulary.


I wonder how I'd do with the Brazilian Portuguese vocabulary. Probably in the low thousands.
Illusions fall like the husk of a fruit, one after another, and the fruit is experience. - Narrator, Sylvie

Je suis méchant.
Reply to message
Help out these researchers: test your English vocabulary - 21/08/2011 03:07:24 PM 814 Views
I tried to be very conservative - 21/08/2011 04:55:08 PM 597 Views
That was my thought as well - 21/08/2011 06:24:06 PM 633 Views
Indeed. If you read their explanation, however, there's a decent reason for that. - 21/08/2011 06:27:34 PM 567 Views
I did read it - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM 492 Views
28,300 words. - 21/08/2011 05:52:10 PM 532 Views
Hmm - 21/08/2011 06:07:36 PM 583 Views
I got 35700, but I was perhaps too generous in ticking boxes. - 21/08/2011 07:49:24 PM 640 Views
The wife had the same reaction to "lots", "somewhat" and "not much". - 21/08/2011 10:15:05 PM 617 Views
Yeah, she would. - 21/08/2011 10:54:20 PM 554 Views
That makes sense. - 22/08/2011 03:49:18 PM 615 Views
I'm going to hope I misinterpreted that, but... - 22/08/2011 07:24:04 PM 539 Views
Nah, you got it, and I didn't. - 22/08/2011 08:27:33 PM 604 Views
37700 *NM* - 21/08/2011 08:52:29 PM 208 Views
Bah, 35,000 *NM* - 21/08/2011 10:02:43 PM 234 Views
I'm only slightly above average - 22/08/2011 04:07:02 AM 518 Views
39,000. It seemed pretty heavy on the Latin derivations. *NM* - 22/08/2011 04:48:23 AM 240 Views
28,800 - 22/08/2011 01:43:36 PM 522 Views
Trollop! Trollop was on the list! Low- 22,800. *NM* - 22/08/2011 08:43:21 PM 222 Views

Reply to Message