Active Users:2247 Time:18/06/2026 02:06:24 PM
Yeah, she would. Legolas Send a noteboard - 21/08/2011 10:54:20 PM
One of these days I've got to get her to pop back in here and tell ya'll these things herself, but she's never been much of a poster, mainly a chatter. But yeah, with the possible exceptions of France and Germany (can't say first hand, but I've heard tales the French have something of a nervous tic about speaking English ) I agree that they underestimated how ubiquitous English is in Western Europe. It's actually a barrier to learning Norwegian, in some ways; not only is it far easier for me to communicate in English with almost everyone I meet, it's usually much easier for THEM than listening to me mangle my way through a grasp of their language most natives surpass by the time they start school. Most of the television here is American or British programs (programmes in the latter case, I suppose ), often on American cable channels or the local versions thereof. Turn on a television here and you're as likely to say an English show with Norwegian subtitles as one in Norwegian; is that "lots" or "somewhat"?

There's a few more exceptions than that, I think; the division is essentially between small countries (or small language areas, rather) and big countries. Scandinavia, the Netherlands, Flanders and to a somewhat lesser extent Portugal all encounter huge amounts of English. Switzerland and Luxembourg are special cases because they've both got so many languages that are important that English is merely one among several, and not necessarily the most important. When the average person watches, what is it, three hours of television a day?, and a very significant portion of the movies/programmes shown in *all* European countries is American or British, the factor of whether or those movies/programmes are dubbed or subtitled becomes rather important for the level of English spoken in a country.

And I had expected no less, re: your experience of being hampered in trying to learn Norwegian. It's much the same way with people trying to learn Dutch. Speaking English is easier and more efficient for everyone involved; the only reason to speak Norwegian would be to help you practice, so people really have to force themselves to think of that every time - or you have to keep asking them. Professional language teachers or those with experience in related issues will have that reflex of sticking with Norwegian, most other people won't.
Reply to message
Help out these researchers: test your English vocabulary - 21/08/2011 03:07:24 PM 902 Views
I tried to be very conservative - 21/08/2011 04:55:08 PM 658 Views
That was my thought as well - 21/08/2011 06:24:06 PM 697 Views
Indeed. If you read their explanation, however, there's a decent reason for that. - 21/08/2011 06:27:34 PM 635 Views
I did read it - 21/08/2011 06:32:28 PM 558 Views
28,300 words. - 21/08/2011 05:52:10 PM 599 Views
Hmm - 21/08/2011 06:07:36 PM 654 Views
I got 35700, but I was perhaps too generous in ticking boxes. - 21/08/2011 07:49:24 PM 700 Views
The wife had the same reaction to "lots", "somewhat" and "not much". - 21/08/2011 10:15:05 PM 683 Views
Yeah, she would. - 21/08/2011 10:54:20 PM 619 Views
That makes sense. - 22/08/2011 03:49:18 PM 693 Views
I'm going to hope I misinterpreted that, but... - 22/08/2011 07:24:04 PM 617 Views
Nah, you got it, and I didn't. - 22/08/2011 08:27:33 PM 680 Views
37700 *NM* - 21/08/2011 08:52:29 PM 236 Views
Bah, 35,000 *NM* - 21/08/2011 10:02:43 PM 266 Views
I'm only slightly above average - 22/08/2011 04:07:02 AM 593 Views
39,000. It seemed pretty heavy on the Latin derivations. *NM* - 22/08/2011 04:48:23 AM 270 Views
28,800 - 22/08/2011 01:43:36 PM 595 Views
Trollop! Trollop was on the list! Low- 22,800. *NM* - 22/08/2011 08:43:21 PM 251 Views

Reply to Message