Active Users:805 Time:29/10/2026 07:39:25 AM
So I see! Nate Send a noteboard - 30/08/2011 09:45:27 PM
If you got that 1.7 million people stat from Wikipedia, do look at numbers below it: population density 308 per square km, total surface: over 5000 square kilometer. Those are country numbers, not city numbers (Belgium as a whole has a higher population density than that, the Netherlands has nearly half again that). In other words: Perth has 1.7 million people because the definition of "Perth" is essentially "every populated place in Western Australia that isn't hundreds of kilometers away from the city centre".

For comparison's sake, if you take that kind of surface around Helsinki, you'd get close to the surface of the entire region of Uusimaa (I love Wikipedia), which has close to 1.5 million people in it.

But those are just quibbles that don't detract from you being right on the main point, clearly I did underestimate Perth's size.


I didn't notice the area they were taking into account. That's a decent chunk of land. I wonder what the population within the city limits is. A quick Google scan didn't turn up anything.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
The world's top ten and worst ten most livable cities - 30/08/2011 07:06:50 PM 1596 Views
How do you call towns "cities"? - 30/08/2011 08:12:27 PM 856 Views
I thought you were going to mention Perth. The rest are clearly cities, if you ask me. - 30/08/2011 08:23:33 PM 826 Views
Perth has 1.7 million people. - 30/08/2011 08:30:26 PM 984 Views
You kind of inadvertently prove the point... - 30/08/2011 09:21:18 PM 1056 Views
So I see! - 30/08/2011 09:45:27 PM 1071 Views
A million people isn't a city? - 30/08/2011 08:28:20 PM 987 Views
Not necessarily. - 30/08/2011 10:49:08 PM 958 Views
You could be right re: population density. - 30/08/2011 11:06:36 PM 888 Views
Re: Not necessarily. - 30/08/2011 11:56:20 PM 982 Views
He's spoilt by living in New York - 31/08/2011 01:26:02 AM 1035 Views
That probably is part of it. - 31/08/2011 02:14:41 AM 841 Views
to meet their definition of best it also seems to help if you have mostly white - 31/08/2011 01:52:11 PM 845 Views
Have you been to Toronto or Vancouver ? - 31/08/2011 04:02:01 PM 858 Views
no but I have the internet and they meet the ethnic description I gave - 31/08/2011 05:25:40 PM 952 Views
Yeah, I'm sorry, but you're fairly off with that one. - 31/08/2011 04:52:25 PM 906 Views
OK you did see where I included Asians didn't you and I would call less than 2% significant - 31/08/2011 05:31:45 PM 894 Views
I believe your words ... - 31/08/2011 05:49:26 PM 882 Views
yeah sprinkling was probably an understatement - 31/08/2011 07:36:16 PM 1105 Views
As a comparison ... - 30/08/2011 08:37:28 PM 1012 Views
that can be a little misleading - 30/08/2011 09:18:22 PM 941 Views
Point taken. - 30/08/2011 09:49:54 PM 1035 Views
Not enough Europe, apparently - 30/08/2011 08:13:48 PM 891 Views
Re: Europe - 30/08/2011 09:32:17 PM 947 Views
Interesting - 30/08/2011 09:59:27 PM 1077 Views
but everything tries to kill you in Oz - 30/08/2011 08:41:51 PM 849 Views
That's what keeps you fit and healthy. *NM* - 30/08/2011 09:17:32 PM 454 Views
weather is a factor and three Canadian cities made the top ten? - 30/08/2011 09:22:32 PM 990 Views
Vancouver at least has a nice climate. - 30/08/2011 09:40:31 PM 1123 Views
yeah there are not vey many US cities I would want to raise kids in - 30/08/2011 11:16:52 PM 805 Views
For the record, I found Vancouver quite lovely. - 31/08/2011 05:09:37 PM 1054 Views
Quality health care in the US, really? - 31/08/2011 12:27:41 AM 948 Views
seriously... - 31/08/2011 05:24:47 AM 867 Views
all you are arguing is quality=free - 31/08/2011 12:11:30 PM 875 Views
Also, - 31/08/2011 12:53:00 PM 953 Views
no it works out that nicely for most people - 31/08/2011 01:36:13 PM 920 Views
How can he afford a week in Vail and not afford insurance? - 31/08/2011 04:22:47 PM 912 Views
a lot of the uninsured are that way from choice - 31/08/2011 06:41:42 PM 836 Views
Livability obviously doesn't include "Concentration of Venomous Creatures". *NM* - 30/08/2011 11:43:43 PM 462 Views
Actually, the reason our cities are so liveable is because they're built to keep said creatures out - 31/08/2011 12:59:01 AM 821 Views
How? - 31/08/2011 08:20:01 AM 816 Views
Why no Boston? *NM* - 31/08/2011 12:16:28 AM 444 Views
A low population density seems to be a key determinant in these rankings - 31/08/2011 12:51:45 AM 809 Views
There is an obvious mistake - 31/08/2011 03:07:31 AM 1138 Views
I was almost killed by a wombat - 31/08/2011 05:26:28 AM 784 Views
you should print that on a tee shirt and sell it - 31/08/2011 09:11:18 PM 799 Views

Reply to Message