When saving some comes at the cost of dooming others, you might.
Legolas Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 11:50:05 PM
Legolas Send a noteboard - 20/09/2011 11:50:05 PM
After all, whose places are those "lottery winners" taking? Kids who live in those districts and originally went to those schools, and now have to go to lesser-quality schools, one surmises. Free school choice instead of school districts is definitely a good idea, but you need more than that to tackle the problem of the bad schools. It's not as if you can just endlessly keep increasing the capacity of the good schools while closing down the bad - it doesn't work that way, except perhaps in some very specific circumstances.
School choice works
- 20/09/2011 10:25:16 PM
653 Views
The word "duh" comes to mind.
- 20/09/2011 11:01:26 PM
352 Views
Regardless, you don't refuse to save some just because you can't save all. *NM*
- 20/09/2011 11:43:04 PM
143 Views
When saving some comes at the cost of dooming others, you might.
- 20/09/2011 11:50:05 PM
314 Views
- 20/09/2011 11:50:05 PM
314 Views
I would assume they kids were taking the extra spots the schools hadm.n
- 21/09/2011 12:41:20 AM
339 Views
Yes, well, they might be performing better exactly because they run below maximum capacity.
- 21/09/2011 08:53:58 PM
304 Views
Cool cool. I'm confused, though- won't pretty much everyone try to get into the "better" schools?
- 20/09/2011 11:47:45 PM
319 Views
If you read the aritcle it tells you the good schools were full to capacity
- 21/09/2011 12:17:15 AM
319 Views
