Active Users:852 Time:15/09/2025 10:29:04 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM
Two that I noticed, technically. In #8, it should be Have at the start of the question. In #9, there should be a dash between "140" and "character". Otherwise you could be talking about 140 shortcuts for characters.


I was actually researching when it was appropriate to use a dash. Do you know what I found out? There are some general rules about it but, for the most part, it's really a style choice. I guess it's one of those quirky, undefined areas of writing. Or can it ever really be defined?
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1101 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... nossy - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 796 Views
I didn't see any errors Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 778 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors nossy - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 653 Views
You mean ... Nate - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 717 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. Nate - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 963 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1235 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 733 Views
Er...yes I meant them as a singular idea... *NM* Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:47:34 PM 455 Views
Use them together, and only together, for fifteen years and we can discuss this again. *NM* Tom - 05/10/2011 09:32:30 PM 390 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 771 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? Nate - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 770 Views
Yeah, pretty much. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 726 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 596 Views
OK then. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 768 Views
No, Joel. You're just wrong. Again. Get used to it. We have. Tom - 05/10/2011 09:31:21 PM 667 Views
I can live with being wrong, at least in the sense of technical error. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:06:30 PM 767 Views
Let's just pare this down to the bare bones. Tom - 06/10/2011 01:37:30 AM 625 Views
He made a mistake that I did not recognize as a mistake because I read his words as he intended. Joel - 06/10/2011 04:43:39 AM 774 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 817 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 749 Views
You're right of course! Nate - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 833 Views
I frequently am. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 837 Views
So I've noticed. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 741 Views
I like telling people, too. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 744 Views
You can use charmap. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 789 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 710 Views
Mmm, dashing. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 750 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 797 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: Tom - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 866 Views
I love this bit. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 859 Views
Bring back the BSG! Joel - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 770 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 725 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 866 Views
Re: serial comma. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 741 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 709 Views
Same here Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 643 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 720 Views
Re: Grammar junkies random thoughts - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 758 Views
Re: Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 814 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 808 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* Nate - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 375 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? Joel - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 712 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 667 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 364 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 915 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p Nate - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 793 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." Joel - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 709 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! Nate - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 716 Views
Ghoti. Also, this is why Rebekah and don't argue this any more. *NM* Ghavrel - 06/10/2011 04:44:42 AM 332 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. Joel - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 721 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. Nate - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 737 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) Joel - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 636 Views
But you are wrong Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 761 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* random thoughts - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 395 Views
I disagree. Joel - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 706 Views
How utterly unsurprising Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 659 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." Joel - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 725 Views
Doesn't matter. Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 750 Views
Perhaps not, but it should, and I am not above being a lone voice crying in the wilderness. Joel - 08/10/2011 05:17:35 PM 816 Views
What. Zeeb - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 806 Views
Those cases are not the same, because those words are already possessive in their own right. Joel - 06/10/2011 10:52:06 PM 802 Views
if you have trouble understanding my post it is more likely do to typing skills than grammar random thoughts - 05/10/2011 09:31:42 PM 718 Views
Likely so; I have the same problem, but usually when writing by hand. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:53:08 PM 701 Views
You called? Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 767 Views
Grammar schmammar! Avendesora - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 840 Views
Wongy tip #77 Two Wongs - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 703 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. TaskmasterJack - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 718 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* Nate - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 349 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 352 Views
A timeless classic. Nate - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 684 Views
Re: Grammar junkies wolfsister - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 733 Views
Yes. Camilla - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 672 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." Joel - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 708 Views
I try ironclad - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 768 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 642 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. Tom - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 691 Views
I wish more people knew this. Rebekah - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 666 Views
Junky Grammar. Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 661 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes