Active Users:692 Time:06/06/2026 06:57:21 AM
Mmm, dashing. Nate Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM
Two that I noticed, technically. In #8, it should be Have at the start of the question. In #9, there should be a dash between "140" and "character". Otherwise you could be talking about 140 shortcuts for characters.


I was actually researching when it was appropriate to use a dash. Do you know what I found out? There are some general rules about it but, for the most part, it's really a style choice. I guess it's one of those quirky, undefined areas of writing. Or can it ever really be defined?


There are certainly a lot of ways they can be used or not used, and people manage to use every single one of them. In my estimation they're good to use whenever they clear up potential ambiguity, such as in your case. A starker example comes from a movie title, "Eight Legged Freaks". Are they freaks with eight legs or are they eight freaks, all of whom have legs? The title doesn't actually make that clear, even though through context and general agreement we know that it means freaks with eight legs. However, you can completely clear any trouble up with a simple dash. "Eight-Legged Freaks". Voila! So whether or not people agree on how to use them, that is how and when I believe they should be used. Note however that this is a difficult one to remember when writing something, and is often the sort of thing a person only catches when proofreading.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1171 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 869 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 847 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 728 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 822 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 1042 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1335 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 812 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 877 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 833 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 794 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 681 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 841 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 888 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 852 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 920 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 915 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 837 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 825 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 877 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 775 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 830 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 903 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 945 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 927 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 876 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 801 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 954 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 830 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 807 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 707 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 789 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 840 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 905 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 898 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 409 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 803 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 739 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 394 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 994 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 891 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 810 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 799 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 805 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 822 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 707 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 851 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 424 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 788 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 777 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 813 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 818 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 893 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 879 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 916 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 779 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 782 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 380 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 399 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 753 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 806 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 743 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 788 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 837 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 706 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 801 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 739 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 739 Views

Reply to Message