Active Users:853 Time:15/09/2025 10:22:54 AM
Mmm, dashing. Nate Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM
Two that I noticed, technically. In #8, it should be Have at the start of the question. In #9, there should be a dash between "140" and "character". Otherwise you could be talking about 140 shortcuts for characters.


I was actually researching when it was appropriate to use a dash. Do you know what I found out? There are some general rules about it but, for the most part, it's really a style choice. I guess it's one of those quirky, undefined areas of writing. Or can it ever really be defined?


There are certainly a lot of ways they can be used or not used, and people manage to use every single one of them. In my estimation they're good to use whenever they clear up potential ambiguity, such as in your case. A starker example comes from a movie title, "Eight Legged Freaks". Are they freaks with eight legs or are they eight freaks, all of whom have legs? The title doesn't actually make that clear, even though through context and general agreement we know that it means freaks with eight legs. However, you can completely clear any trouble up with a simple dash. "Eight-Legged Freaks". Voila! So whether or not people agree on how to use them, that is how and when I believe they should be used. Note however that this is a difficult one to remember when writing something, and is often the sort of thing a person only catches when proofreading.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1101 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 795 Views
I didn't see any errors - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 777 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 653 Views
You mean ... - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 717 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 962 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1235 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 733 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 770 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 770 Views
Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 725 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 596 Views
OK then. - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 768 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 816 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 749 Views
You're right of course! - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 833 Views
I frequently am. - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 837 Views
So I've noticed. - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 741 Views
I like telling people, too. - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 743 Views
You can use charmap. - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 788 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 710 Views
Mmm, dashing. - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 750 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 797 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 866 Views
I love this bit. - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 858 Views
Bring back the BSG! - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 769 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 725 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 866 Views
Re: serial comma. - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 741 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 709 Views
Same here - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 642 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 720 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 757 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 814 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 808 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 375 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 712 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 667 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 364 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 914 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 793 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 708 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 716 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 721 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 737 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 634 Views
But you are wrong - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 761 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 395 Views
I disagree. - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 706 Views
How utterly unsurprising - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 659 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 725 Views
Doesn't matter. - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 749 Views
What. - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 805 Views
You called? - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 767 Views
Grammar schmammar! - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 840 Views
Wongy tip #77 - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 703 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 718 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 349 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 351 Views
A timeless classic. - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 684 Views
Re: Grammar junkies - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 732 Views
Yes. - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 672 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 708 Views
I try - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 768 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 642 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 691 Views
I wish more people knew this. - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 666 Views
Junky Grammar. - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 661 Views

Reply to Message