Active Users:1090 Time:11/09/2026 07:28:08 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day Dark Knight Send a noteboard - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM
Two that I noticed, technically. In #8, it should be Have at the start of the question. In #9, there should be a dash between "140" and "character". Otherwise you could be talking about 140 shortcuts for characters.


I was actually researching when it was appropriate to use a dash. Do you know what I found out? There are some general rules about it but, for the most part, it's really a style choice. I guess it's one of those quirky, undefined areas of writing. Or can it ever really be defined?
Formerly Mat Bloody Cauthon on Wotmania, blessed be its name
Reply to message
Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 06:46:31 PM 1203 Views
I'm not always sure that I'm correct, but.... nossy - 05/10/2011 07:04:13 PM 906 Views
I didn't see any errors Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 07:24:27 PM 891 Views
Re: I didn't see any errors nossy - 06/10/2011 03:14:07 PM 763 Views
You mean ... Nate - 06/10/2011 03:58:32 PM 860 Views
Must ... have ... grammar. Nate - 05/10/2011 07:53:34 PM 1079 Views
For you and Tom as well, the same question about question eight. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:33:39 PM 1377 Views
Tom can probably give you actual terms and correct rules, but here's my take on it. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:43:47 PM 854 Views
Er...yes I meant them as a singular idea... *NM* Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:47:34 PM 499 Views
Use them together, and only together, for fifteen years and we can discuss this again. *NM* Tom - 05/10/2011 09:32:30 PM 440 Views
That makes sense as far as it goes. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:02:42 PM 927 Views
But do you actually regard them that way? Nate - 05/10/2011 09:08:36 PM 873 Views
Yeah, pretty much. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:25:18 PM 842 Views
Re: Yeah, pretty much. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:29:33 PM 716 Views
OK then. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:59:50 PM 878 Views
No, Joel. You're just wrong. Again. Get used to it. We have. Tom - 05/10/2011 09:31:21 PM 786 Views
I can live with being wrong, at least in the sense of technical error. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:06:30 PM 880 Views
Let's just pare this down to the bare bones. Tom - 06/10/2011 01:37:30 AM 722 Views
He made a mistake that I did not recognize as a mistake because I read his words as he intended. Joel - 06/10/2011 04:43:39 AM 884 Views
You bring up a point that I was researching the other day Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:53:40 PM 920 Views
You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:00:25 PM 887 Views
You're right of course! Nate - 05/10/2011 09:13:44 PM 953 Views
I frequently am. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:16:38 PM 956 Views
So I've noticed. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:19:38 PM 887 Views
I like telling people, too. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:34:50 PM 876 Views
You can use charmap. Joel - 05/10/2011 10:21:32 PM 909 Views
Re: You guys mean a hyphen, not a dash. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:15:02 PM 812 Views
Mmm, dashing. Nate - 05/10/2011 09:02:53 PM 867 Views
Emdashing is an entirely different form of punctuation. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:07:36 PM 954 Views
Achtung! Grammatik! :insert Nazi-saluting smiley as the Wehrmacht marches by: Tom - 05/10/2011 08:10:45 PM 984 Views
I love this bit. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:26:52 PM 962 Views
Bring back the BSG! Joel - 05/10/2011 08:55:32 PM 914 Views
Re: your 2nd irritating error for question 2 Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:12:49 PM 837 Views
Good poll, especially for this site. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:11:10 PM 988 Views
Re: serial comma. Nate - 05/10/2011 08:31:58 PM 871 Views
Maybe I was being a little anal there. Joel - 05/10/2011 08:35:33 PM 846 Views
Same here Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:43:34 PM 737 Views
I think it's conventional to use a comma before "etc". Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:55:11 PM 820 Views
Re: Grammar junkies random thoughts - 05/10/2011 08:33:06 PM 878 Views
Re: Grammar junkies Dark Knight - 05/10/2011 08:49:43 PM 940 Views
People should talk in a way that can be understood, else they are not communicating. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:17:37 PM 931 Views
Re: "everyone's". ~winky~ *NM* Nate - 05/10/2011 09:22:18 PM 428 Views
Is it time for my lecture on superfluous apostrophes again? Joel - 05/10/2011 09:43:47 PM 836 Views
You mean your lecture on "superfluous" apostrophes. Rebekah - 05/10/2011 09:53:31 PM 787 Views
As have I. Multiple times. *NM* Ghavrel - 05/10/2011 09:55:08 PM 412 Views
I am not stubborn, just true to my convictions. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:56:39 PM 1037 Views
Unsurprisingly, I don't really agree with you at all on this point. :p Nate - 05/10/2011 10:29:59 PM 926 Views
I do not really think I am "right" on this one so much as "not wrong." Joel - 06/10/2011 12:01:36 AM 856 Views
But contradictions are inherent in the entire English language! Nate - 06/10/2011 01:25:39 AM 839 Views
Ghoti. Also, this is why Rebekah and don't argue this any more. *NM* Ghavrel - 06/10/2011 04:44:42 AM 388 Views
Sure, but not deliberate ones created by grammarians who know better. Joel - 06/10/2011 05:40:58 AM 835 Views
I'm going to listen to the others. Nate - 06/10/2011 06:17:18 AM 859 Views
Like I say, I appreciate exceptions when justified (and again, only claiming to be "not wrong." ) Joel - 06/10/2011 07:26:18 AM 746 Views
But you are wrong Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 02:17:40 PM 903 Views
that is OK he is very good at being wrong *NM* random thoughts - 06/10/2011 03:43:23 PM 440 Views
I disagree. Joel - 07/10/2011 12:15:14 AM 826 Views
How utterly unsurprising Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 02:21:38 PM 821 Views
"We want to be nothing if not persistent." Joel - 07/10/2011 02:39:19 PM 853 Views
Doesn't matter. Sareitha Sedai - 07/10/2011 03:12:14 PM 850 Views
Perhaps not, but it should, and I am not above being a lone voice crying in the wilderness. Joel - 08/10/2011 05:17:35 PM 957 Views
What. Zeeb - 06/10/2011 06:17:41 PM 932 Views
Those cases are not the same, because those words are already possessive in their own right. Joel - 06/10/2011 10:52:06 PM 919 Views
if you have trouble understanding my post it is more likely do to typing skills than grammar random thoughts - 05/10/2011 09:31:42 PM 847 Views
Likely so; I have the same problem, but usually when writing by hand. Joel - 05/10/2011 09:53:08 PM 798 Views
You called? Rebekah - 05/10/2011 08:53:54 PM 921 Views
Grammar schmammar! Avendesora - 05/10/2011 09:01:47 PM 953 Views
Wongy tip #77 Two Wongs - 05/10/2011 11:15:12 PM 812 Views
#1) I do not use NetSpeak while playing games, texting or using social media. TaskmasterJack - 05/10/2011 11:34:12 PM 809 Views
What about NateSpeak? *NM* Nate - 06/10/2011 04:01:08 PM 400 Views
I did use that once to tell the story of you and CNRedDragon going to see Ice Princess. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 07/10/2011 01:46:50 AM 431 Views
A timeless classic. Nate - 07/10/2011 01:53:36 AM 789 Views
Re: Grammar junkies wolfsister - 06/10/2011 01:17:28 AM 840 Views
Yes. Camilla - 06/10/2011 06:53:46 AM 776 Views
I forgot about "of" for "have." Joel - 06/10/2011 07:31:11 AM 820 Views
I try ironclad - 06/10/2011 09:18:29 AM 887 Views
I freebase split infinitives on a regular basis. Stephen - 06/10/2011 01:53:36 PM 739 Views
The split infinitive is not grammatically incorrect. Tom - 06/10/2011 02:04:34 PM 836 Views
I wish more people knew this. Rebekah - 06/10/2011 07:38:46 PM 769 Views
Junky Grammar. Sareitha Sedai - 06/10/2011 04:24:01 PM 789 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes