Active Users:692 Time:31/05/2026 05:33:42 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
No. MightyYT Send a noteboard - 13/10/2011 05:59:07 AM
I don't think that they can. At least, not long term. In the short run, they will be able to focus efforts in the area that are most affecting their own citizens instead of a blanket policy for the whole nation.

What will happen though, is government bloat. That bloat will increase state taxes beyond the breaking point and bankrupt the states, causing the Federal government to step in.
Castle: This is so weird. I dressed up as him for Halloween.

Beckett: Me too.

~When Castle and Beckett met Gene Simmons.
Reply to message
States and Federal Government MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 05:08:14 AM 645 Views
No. MightyYT - 13/10/2011 05:59:07 AM 429 Views
Re: No. MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 07:07:14 AM 424 Views
Re: No. Macharius - 13/10/2011 01:59:58 PM 412 Views
Economy of scale applies to every private bureaucracy, but not government ones. Joel - 13/10/2011 06:53:44 PM 403 Views
of course economy of scale applies just like diseconomy of scale random thoughts - 13/10/2011 10:38:45 PM 497 Views
And both are a function of size rather than government. Joel - 14/10/2011 11:08:53 AM 508 Views
This is a ridiculous claim MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:44:35 PM 410 Views
you can do it with block grants random thoughts - 13/10/2011 06:13:48 AM 385 Views
Believing the states can't do it, is not the same as saying the states will be less efficent or more *NM* Roland00 - 13/10/2011 06:42:34 AM 165 Views
That is a BS argument random thoughts - 13/10/2011 02:08:23 PM 401 Views
Medicaid is already state-managed Isaac - 13/10/2011 06:22:54 AM 497 Views
Yep, You're correct. MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 06:53:38 AM 411 Views
I think you just pinpointed my basic problem with vouchers. Joel - 13/10/2011 06:36:58 PM 463 Views
Ah, Tricare Isaac - 13/10/2011 10:07:59 PM 415 Views
I pretty much agree with this LadyLorraine - 13/10/2011 02:03:04 PM 398 Views
It may still be a better option though, but I wouldn't consider it a likely great success story Isaac - 13/10/2011 09:23:16 PM 482 Views
No I do not believe they do could do Medicare or Social Security more effectively *NM* Roland00 - 13/10/2011 06:41:03 AM 168 Views
Care to elaborate? *NM* MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 06:55:21 AM 192 Views
Would you rather have 50 insurance companies with different pay structures or 1? Roland00 - 14/10/2011 02:14:23 AM 411 Views
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity Joel - 13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM 491 Views
<Type Random Subject Here> MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:55:04 PM 416 Views
Because some things do not matter much with geography and culture Roland00 - 14/10/2011 02:20:04 AM 395 Views
Yet again I must disagree MrFarstrider - 14/10/2011 05:04:43 AM 419 Views
I agree, it's not necessarily that the need itself changes... LadyLorraine - 14/10/2011 09:06:19 AM 385 Views
Think about fire, how much need will Alaska have for fire trucks? *NM* Roland00 - 14/10/2011 12:30:05 PM 170 Views
Some issues are exclusively local and best handled there, as are some resources. Joel - 14/10/2011 11:22:46 AM 422 Views
The first thought that came to mind..... Jeordam - 13/10/2011 08:55:36 PM 417 Views
I disagree MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:49:15 PM 471 Views
Except when its time to retire.... Jeordam - 14/10/2011 04:03:22 PM 390 Views
Absolutely not *NM* Two Wongs - 14/10/2011 10:55:01 AM 194 Views
Depends on the state and its legislators, doesn't it? But, generally, no. *NM* Palatine - 14/10/2011 06:50:13 PM 166 Views
Pick your rapist and tell me why it makes a damn bit of difference. *NM* Cannoli - 15/10/2011 05:06:50 PM 174 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes