Active Users:838 Time:31/05/2026 07:00:03 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
That is a BS argument random thoughts Send a noteboard - 13/10/2011 02:08:23 PM
The states are already running their own programs so efficiency isn't the issue. The problem is the Fed wants to tell them how to run and regulate them. Even ignoring the inefficiencies created by being forced to meet regulations that often make no sense the work it takes to ensure you are meeting those regulations creates inefficiencies. State and local governments have to hire hoards of additional people just to do the extra paper work and to audit themselves in order to ensure they meeting them.

State governments are run by grownups and they don't need mommy fed to look over their shoulders.
Reply to message
States and Federal Government MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 05:08:14 AM 645 Views
No. MightyYT - 13/10/2011 05:59:07 AM 430 Views
Re: No. MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 07:07:14 AM 426 Views
Re: No. Macharius - 13/10/2011 01:59:58 PM 412 Views
Economy of scale applies to every private bureaucracy, but not government ones. Joel - 13/10/2011 06:53:44 PM 405 Views
of course economy of scale applies just like diseconomy of scale random thoughts - 13/10/2011 10:38:45 PM 499 Views
And both are a function of size rather than government. Joel - 14/10/2011 11:08:53 AM 510 Views
This is a ridiculous claim MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:44:35 PM 410 Views
you can do it with block grants random thoughts - 13/10/2011 06:13:48 AM 385 Views
Believing the states can't do it, is not the same as saying the states will be less efficent or more *NM* Roland00 - 13/10/2011 06:42:34 AM 165 Views
That is a BS argument random thoughts - 13/10/2011 02:08:23 PM 402 Views
Medicaid is already state-managed Isaac - 13/10/2011 06:22:54 AM 498 Views
Yep, You're correct. MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 06:53:38 AM 411 Views
I think you just pinpointed my basic problem with vouchers. Joel - 13/10/2011 06:36:58 PM 464 Views
Ah, Tricare Isaac - 13/10/2011 10:07:59 PM 417 Views
I pretty much agree with this LadyLorraine - 13/10/2011 02:03:04 PM 398 Views
It may still be a better option though, but I wouldn't consider it a likely great success story Isaac - 13/10/2011 09:23:16 PM 482 Views
No I do not believe they do could do Medicare or Social Security more effectively *NM* Roland00 - 13/10/2011 06:41:03 AM 168 Views
Care to elaborate? *NM* MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 06:55:21 AM 192 Views
Would you rather have 50 insurance companies with different pay structures or 1? Roland00 - 14/10/2011 02:14:23 AM 412 Views
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity Joel - 13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM 492 Views
<Type Random Subject Here> MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:55:04 PM 418 Views
Because some things do not matter much with geography and culture Roland00 - 14/10/2011 02:20:04 AM 395 Views
Yet again I must disagree MrFarstrider - 14/10/2011 05:04:43 AM 420 Views
I agree, it's not necessarily that the need itself changes... LadyLorraine - 14/10/2011 09:06:19 AM 387 Views
Think about fire, how much need will Alaska have for fire trucks? *NM* Roland00 - 14/10/2011 12:30:05 PM 170 Views
Some issues are exclusively local and best handled there, as are some resources. Joel - 14/10/2011 11:22:46 AM 422 Views
The first thought that came to mind..... Jeordam - 13/10/2011 08:55:36 PM 419 Views
I disagree MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:49:15 PM 471 Views
Except when its time to retire.... Jeordam - 14/10/2011 04:03:22 PM 392 Views
Absolutely not *NM* Two Wongs - 14/10/2011 10:55:01 AM 194 Views
Depends on the state and its legislators, doesn't it? But, generally, no. *NM* Palatine - 14/10/2011 06:50:13 PM 166 Views
Pick your rapist and tell me why it makes a damn bit of difference. *NM* Cannoli - 15/10/2011 05:06:50 PM 174 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes