Active Users:324 Time:16/07/2025 01:07:43 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
This is a ridiculous claim MrFarstrider Send a noteboard - 13/10/2011 09:44:35 PM
Under this logic it wouldn't make any sense to have a state government since everything the state does could be done more efficiently by the federal government. Yet we still let states handle a lot of things like vehicle registrations, schools, state police etc.

I do understand your concerns about people moving between states and what not but people do that all the time and it still doesn't take away a State's ability to run all of the projects it does. Perhaps medicare and SS couldn't operate in the fashion it does now but that also doesn't mean the current method of employing these entitlements isn't the only way it can be done.
Reply to message
States and Federal Government MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 05:08:14 AM 570 Views
No. MightyYT - 13/10/2011 05:59:07 AM 355 Views
Re: No. MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 07:07:14 AM 344 Views
Re: No. Macharius - 13/10/2011 01:59:58 PM 335 Views
Economy of scale applies to every private bureaucracy, but not government ones. Joel - 13/10/2011 06:53:44 PM 325 Views
of course economy of scale applies just like diseconomy of scale random thoughts - 13/10/2011 10:38:45 PM 382 Views
And both are a function of size rather than government. Joel - 14/10/2011 11:08:53 AM 406 Views
This is a ridiculous claim MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:44:35 PM 331 Views
you can do it with block grants random thoughts - 13/10/2011 06:13:48 AM 316 Views
Believing the states can't do it, is not the same as saying the states will be less efficent or more *NM* Roland00 - 13/10/2011 06:42:34 AM 129 Views
That is a BS argument random thoughts - 13/10/2011 02:08:23 PM 322 Views
Medicaid is already state-managed Isaac - 13/10/2011 06:22:54 AM 417 Views
Yep, You're correct. MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 06:53:38 AM 338 Views
I think you just pinpointed my basic problem with vouchers. Joel - 13/10/2011 06:36:58 PM 362 Views
Ah, Tricare Isaac - 13/10/2011 10:07:59 PM 319 Views
I pretty much agree with this LadyLorraine - 13/10/2011 02:03:04 PM 321 Views
It may still be a better option though, but I wouldn't consider it a likely great success story Isaac - 13/10/2011 09:23:16 PM 407 Views
No I do not believe they do could do Medicare or Social Security more effectively *NM* Roland00 - 13/10/2011 06:41:03 AM 134 Views
Care to elaborate? *NM* MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 06:55:21 AM 157 Views
Would you rather have 50 insurance companies with different pay structures or 1? Roland00 - 14/10/2011 02:14:23 AM 333 Views
If programs to ensure federal citizen rights were divided among the states it would invite disparity Joel - 13/10/2011 06:50:02 PM 394 Views
<Type Random Subject Here> MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:55:04 PM 333 Views
Because some things do not matter much with geography and culture Roland00 - 14/10/2011 02:20:04 AM 314 Views
Yet again I must disagree MrFarstrider - 14/10/2011 05:04:43 AM 332 Views
I agree, it's not necessarily that the need itself changes... LadyLorraine - 14/10/2011 09:06:19 AM 311 Views
Think about fire, how much need will Alaska have for fire trucks? *NM* Roland00 - 14/10/2011 12:30:05 PM 131 Views
Some issues are exclusively local and best handled there, as are some resources. Joel - 14/10/2011 11:22:46 AM 337 Views
The first thought that came to mind..... Jeordam - 13/10/2011 08:55:36 PM 333 Views
I disagree MrFarstrider - 13/10/2011 09:49:15 PM 390 Views
Except when its time to retire.... Jeordam - 14/10/2011 04:03:22 PM 311 Views
Absolutely not *NM* Two Wongs - 14/10/2011 10:55:01 AM 160 Views
Depends on the state and its legislators, doesn't it? But, generally, no. *NM* Palatine - 14/10/2011 06:50:13 PM 134 Views
Pick your rapist and tell me why it makes a damn bit of difference. *NM* Cannoli - 15/10/2011 05:06:50 PM 142 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes