We really do need an option to disable or at least move the tweet box.
I love you guys, but I'm phenomenally uninterested in the status of your bartabs.
22/10/2011 01:12:00 PM
- 858 Views
So, there are occasions of other subjects in which you are interested in the tweet box? *NM*
22/10/2011 02:07:00 PM
- 138 Views
Sanderson tweeting about being nearly done with being nearly done with WoT was good.
22/10/2011 03:11:43 PM
- 364 Views
Not really. But the self-absorbed vapidity of some really aggravates me. *NM*
22/10/2011 09:00:53 PM
- 155 Views
I don't notice them 85% of the time, so they don't bother me. *NM*
22/10/2011 09:54:38 PM
- 211 Views
I'm interested in their bartabs
*NM*
23/10/2011 02:43:46 AM
- 181 Views

Follow them on Twitter then.
*NM*
23/10/2011 08:37:53 AM
- 147 Views

I already do
23/10/2011 10:03:37 AM
- 378 Views

Web 2.0 is a vapid scam, and Twitter's existence is contrary to a discussion forum. *NM*
23/10/2011 10:23:09 AM
- 147 Views
By participating in this thread you've smeared yourself in Web2.0 jelly and danced a Rumba
23/10/2011 10:26:00 AM
- 392 Views
You kidding? Behind the scenes, yeah, probably, but RAFO's style is like Web 0.5.
*NM*
23/10/2011 10:59:05 AM
- 146 Views

You are such a grump.
23/10/2011 08:21:33 AM
- 370 Views
I'm just not interested in every detail of your lives. NSSP tags and Journals exist for a reason.
23/10/2011 08:39:06 AM
- 446 Views
You're not getting every little detail of our lives. You're getting little GATHERING reports.
23/10/2011 04:10:00 PM
- 397 Views
He's right though.
23/10/2011 09:34:05 AM
- 411 Views
Yes, and that point has been made before.
23/10/2011 04:11:50 PM
- 430 Views
I have seen the question a few times. What I don't recall seeing is an answer.
24/10/2011 01:53:31 PM
- 394 Views
I'd agree if it was twelve tweets or if they started commenting Rugby from the pub via Twitter
23/10/2011 04:29:32 PM
- 434 Views