Active Users:541 Time:14/12/2025 08:15:18 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Maybe the point should be listened to, then. Ghavrel Send a noteboard - 23/10/2011 08:35:44 PM
It's all well and good to buy into the foolishness of social media, but you might at least spare those of us already here your little vignettes about bartabs and pancakes. There's no substance to twitter posts, and not close to enough content to make them interesting.
"We feel safe when we read what we recognise, what does not challenge our way of thinking.... a steady acceptance of pre-arranged patterns leads to the inability to question what we are told."
~Camilla

Ghavrel is Ghavrel is Ghavrel

*MySmiley*

Reply to message
I love you guys, but I'm phenomenally uninterested in the status of your bartabs. Ghavrel - 22/10/2011 01:12:00 PM 894 Views
So, there are occasions of other subjects in which you are interested in the tweet box? *NM* TaskmasterJack - 22/10/2011 02:07:00 PM 154 Views
Sanderson tweeting about being nearly done with being nearly done with WoT was good. Joel - 22/10/2011 03:11:43 PM 411 Views
Not really. But the self-absorbed vapidity of some really aggravates me. *NM* Ghavrel - 22/10/2011 09:00:53 PM 169 Views
Perhaps you don't understand the purpose of Twitter. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 22/10/2011 11:45:18 PM 201 Views
Or he does, and that's why he's not on there... *NM* Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 01:48:57 PM 160 Views
I don't notice them 85% of the time, so they don't bother me. *NM* Avendesora - 22/10/2011 09:54:38 PM 228 Views
I'm interested in their bartabs *NM* Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 02:43:46 AM 200 Views
Follow them on Twitter then. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:37:53 AM 161 Views
I already do Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 10:03:37 AM 420 Views
Web 2.0 is a vapid scam, and Twitter's existence is contrary to a discussion forum. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 10:23:09 AM 162 Views
By participating in this thread you've smeared yourself in Web2.0 jelly and danced a Rumba Two Wongs - 23/10/2011 10:26:00 AM 437 Views
You kidding? Behind the scenes, yeah, probably, but RAFO's style is like Web 0.5. *NM* Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 10:59:05 AM 160 Views
You are such a grump. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 08:21:33 AM 413 Views
I'm just not interested in every detail of your lives. NSSP tags and Journals exist for a reason. Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:39:06 AM 489 Views
I didn't even know there was a tweet box Helene - 23/10/2011 08:48:28 AM 416 Views
You're not getting every little detail of our lives. You're getting little GATHERING reports. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 04:10:00 PM 452 Views
Maybe the point should be listened to, then. Ghavrel - 23/10/2011 08:35:44 PM 413 Views
Patience is a virtue. Rebekah - 24/10/2011 08:16:52 AM 411 Views
He's right though. ranagrande - 23/10/2011 09:34:05 AM 452 Views
Yes, and that point has been made before. Rebekah - 23/10/2011 04:11:50 PM 491 Views
I have seen the question a few times. What I don't recall seeing is an answer. Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 01:53:31 PM 439 Views
Ben gave me a sort-of answer once. Nate - 24/10/2011 05:05:32 PM 415 Views
See, to me Sareitha Sedai - 24/10/2011 05:27:45 PM 451 Views
Re: See, to me TaskmasterJack - 25/10/2011 12:00:21 AM 363 Views
I thought it had been. *NM* Rebekah - 24/10/2011 07:01:53 PM 191 Views
I'd agree if it was twelve tweets or if they started commenting Rugby from the pub via Twitter ironclad - 23/10/2011 04:29:32 PM 474 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes