Back when I was first harping on it. He said that he was considering what to do about it. Personally I'd just like to see it bumped beneath the Quote of the Moment and then let alone. If it were turned into an option you could disable with a premium account that would be fine too. But I do think there's a value to it; I just don't think it should be so prominent when it only changes maybe once per day. Put it beneath the Quote, people can check it once per day and then it's more out of the way.
...that is a non-answer that invites feedback
FWIW I think moving it shouldn't have any effect at all on its ability to drive traffic to the site; furthermore, I think the ability to disable it is another perk that might make someone decide to purchase a premie. I also find it annoying, but I'm clearly not its intended audience since I'm a) not on Twitter and b) already here. So I mostly ignore it.
If you are from Betelgeuse, please have one of your Earth friends read what I've written before you respond. Or try concentrating harder.
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
"The trophy problem has become extreme."
I love you guys, but I'm phenomenally uninterested in the status of your bartabs.
- 22/10/2011 01:12:00 PM
957 Views
So, there are occasions of other subjects in which you are interested in the tweet box? *NM*
- 22/10/2011 02:07:00 PM
187 Views
Sanderson tweeting about being nearly done with being nearly done with WoT was good.
- 22/10/2011 03:11:43 PM
493 Views
Not really. But the self-absorbed vapidity of some really aggravates me. *NM*
- 22/10/2011 09:00:53 PM
203 Views
I don't notice them 85% of the time, so they don't bother me. *NM*
- 22/10/2011 09:54:38 PM
263 Views
I'm interested in their bartabs 
*NM*
- 23/10/2011 02:43:46 AM
237 Views
*NM*
- 23/10/2011 02:43:46 AM
237 Views
Follow them on Twitter then. 
*NM*
- 23/10/2011 08:37:53 AM
199 Views
*NM*
- 23/10/2011 08:37:53 AM
199 Views
I already do
- 23/10/2011 10:03:37 AM
492 Views
- 23/10/2011 10:03:37 AM
492 Views
Web 2.0 is a vapid scam, and Twitter's existence is contrary to a discussion forum. *NM*
- 23/10/2011 10:23:09 AM
195 Views
By participating in this thread you've smeared yourself in Web2.0 jelly and danced a Rumba
- 23/10/2011 10:26:00 AM
508 Views
You kidding? Behind the scenes, yeah, probably, but RAFO's style is like Web 0.5. *NM*
- 23/10/2011 10:59:05 AM
196 Views
*NM*
- 23/10/2011 10:59:05 AM
196 Views
You are such a grump.
- 23/10/2011 08:21:33 AM
486 Views
I'm just not interested in every detail of your lives. NSSP tags and Journals exist for a reason.
- 23/10/2011 08:39:06 AM
568 Views
You're not getting every little detail of our lives. You're getting little GATHERING reports.
- 23/10/2011 04:10:00 PM
525 Views
He's right though.
- 23/10/2011 09:34:05 AM
518 Views
Yes, and that point has been made before.
- 23/10/2011 04:11:50 PM
570 Views
I have seen the question a few times. What I don't recall seeing is an answer.
- 24/10/2011 01:53:31 PM
516 Views
I'd agree if it was twelve tweets or if they started commenting Rugby from the pub via Twitter
- 23/10/2011 04:29:32 PM
537 Views