Active Users:376 Time:02/05/2025 05:23:57 AM
Re: The trouble is ... Nate Send a noteboard - 31/10/2011 02:52:44 PM
That is why I said a Pento, not a chat admin. There were more than one admin. And yes, I suppose it would have to be someone Ben was willing to trust. Although I am sure a disclaimer could solve a potential legal problem. There could be admins under this particular person, but that person, not Ben, would deal with the (possible) bitching.


At that point it sounds like you have the exact same system that failed so spectacularly on wotmania. If Ben did choose someone to be the overseer and ultimate authority of chat, like Pento it would have to be someone who didn't give a rat's ass about criticism and who also couldn't care less if he offended any of the chat users with his actions. I would also suggest it would have to be someone who didn't participate whatsoever in chat, to avoid entanglement in the very conflict/drama that had to be resolved.

I would like to believe we are able to act sensibly, but you are probably right.


Some can. Some seem incapable. And when the brown stuff hits the fan, a lot of those who can become people who can't.

I think it would help the site grow. I was not a frequent chat user either, but I enjoyed the stuff that spilt out of chat and on to the boards. Except the Amy/Urza stuff, which was just boring (and nothing is worse than boring drama).


The only thing I hated more than chat posts were troll posts. :p

And even if you resolved all of this effectively, there are still the time and money factors ...
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Hey Ben? Um...I hate being a pain in the ass but - 30/10/2011 10:15:28 PM 1352 Views
Probably - 30/10/2011 10:23:00 PM 868 Views
Lets be honest - 30/10/2011 10:31:01 PM 926 Views
Then don't moderate the chatroom. - 31/10/2011 12:12:05 AM 899 Views
I don't see that helping anything. *NM* - 31/10/2011 03:05:08 AM 458 Views
Re: Lets be honest - 31/10/2011 06:04:03 AM 1062 Views
Re: Lets be honest - 31/10/2011 07:16:03 AM 908 Views
Very true - 31/10/2011 09:32:35 AM 838 Views
That may be beyond Taylor's capabilities *NM* - 31/10/2011 03:57:40 PM 431 Views
right back at ya bro haha *NM* - 01/11/2011 04:26:56 AM 571 Views
Or asses. Just sayin' - 01/11/2011 01:18:21 AM 844 Views
I'm in favor of this - 31/10/2011 12:56:41 AM 897 Views
The way I see it ... - 31/10/2011 03:09:37 AM 900 Views
Entirely agree *NM* - 31/10/2011 10:49:46 AM 398 Views
Solution - 31/10/2011 12:57:54 PM 918 Views
The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:36:53 PM 890 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:44:15 PM 849 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:52:44 PM 828 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 31/10/2011 02:58:06 PM 1086 Views
Re: The trouble is ... - 01/11/2011 01:21:37 AM 804 Views
Agreed *NM* - 31/10/2011 06:39:28 AM 420 Views
You can always do AIM. - 31/10/2011 10:27:13 PM 852 Views
There is the Invite Only chat. Very restrictive. - 01/11/2011 01:26:58 AM 868 Views
I didn't want to be in your racist chat anyway. *NM* - 01/11/2011 02:52:54 AM 402 Views
What if we added a separate Canadian drinking fountain? - 01/11/2011 11:36:16 PM 803 Views
While you are at it... - 02/11/2011 01:17:33 PM 803 Views
*NM* - 02/11/2011 11:00:21 PM 391 Views
There was that one time though... - 01/11/2011 12:21:08 PM 799 Views
You paint a very rockin' picture... even if Minnesotans are just slightly warmer Canadians. *NM* - 01/11/2011 11:37:58 PM 406 Views
Hey!!! Well, that's true... though it hasn't snowed here YET. - 02/11/2011 01:16:43 PM 798 Views
And it better not any time soon *NM* - 07/11/2011 06:38:59 PM 415 Views
Why not an IRC channel? - 01/11/2011 02:02:42 AM 814 Views
I've been advocating this for quite literally years now. *NM* - 01/11/2011 12:06:29 PM 400 Views
Yeah, some of us liked the drama threads *NM* - 01/11/2011 06:39:38 PM 418 Views
Hi you! - 14/11/2011 04:01:15 AM 847 Views

Reply to Message