Active Users:177 Time:17/05/2024 03:53:51 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: The trouble is ... Camilla Send a noteboard - 31/10/2011 02:58:06 PM
That is why I said a Pento, not a chat admin. There were more than one admin. And yes, I suppose it would have to be someone Ben was willing to trust. Although I am sure a disclaimer could solve a potential legal problem. There could be admins under this particular person, but that person, not Ben, would deal with the (possible) bitching.

At that point it sounds like you have the exact same system that failed so spectacularly on wotmania. If Ben did choose someone to be the overseer and ultimate authority of chat, like Pento it would have to be someone who didn't give a rat's ass about criticism and who also couldn't care less if he offended any of the chat users with his actions. I would also suggest it would have to be someone who didn't participate whatsoever in chat, to avoid entanglement in the very conflict/drama that had to be resolved.


It failed at wotmania because the Pento stopped working. The person would not have to avoid chat, just not get sucked into arguments. I am sure there is such a person somewhere.

I would like to believe we are able to act sensibly, but you are probably right.

Some can. Some seem incapable. And when the brown stuff hits the fan, a lot of those who can become people who can't.

I think it would help the site grow. I was not a frequent chat user either, but I enjoyed the stuff that spilt out of chat and on to the boards. Except the Amy/Urza stuff, which was just boring (and nothing is worse than boring drama).

The only thing I hated more than chat posts were troll posts. :p


And the two were often the same.

And even if you resolved all of this effectively, there are still the time and money factors ...


I really do believe that chat would pay for itself, though. As long as it did not degenerate. It is much less scary participating in chat than posting on a messageboard for the first time, and I think a lot of people slowly graduated from chat because they felt comfortable after having been there for a while. Beacause of the stigma of newbieism, message boards are scary places. This one perhaps more than many others precisely because we have a community with some shared history. Chat could help ease peopel into it.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
Hey Ben? Um...I hate being a pain in the ass but Danu - 30/10/2011 10:15:28 PM 1196 Views
Probably Lews_TherinThelamon - 30/10/2011 10:23:00 PM 705 Views
Lets be honest Wibble - 30/10/2011 10:31:01 PM 778 Views
Then don't moderate the chatroom. Great Lord of Chaos - 31/10/2011 12:12:05 AM 738 Views
I don't see that helping anything. *NM* Kronin al'Sulc - 31/10/2011 03:05:08 AM 379 Views
That last is probably a bad environment in which to create a chat. Joel - 31/10/2011 10:37:59 PM 697 Views
Re: Lets be honest moridin15 - 31/10/2011 06:04:03 AM 908 Views
Re: Lets be honest Colonel Logain - 31/10/2011 07:16:03 AM 734 Views
Very true Camilla - 31/10/2011 09:32:35 AM 678 Views
That may be beyond Taylor's capabilities *NM* Hieshyn - 31/10/2011 03:57:40 PM 356 Views
right back at ya bro haha *NM* moridin15 - 01/11/2011 04:26:56 AM 476 Views
Or asses. Just sayin' Tash - 01/11/2011 01:18:21 AM 679 Views
I'm in favor of this Hieshyn - 31/10/2011 12:56:41 AM 756 Views
The way I see it ... Nate - 31/10/2011 03:09:37 AM 758 Views
Entirely agree *NM* ironclad - 31/10/2011 10:49:46 AM 320 Views
Solution Camilla - 31/10/2011 12:57:54 PM 751 Views
The trouble is ... Nate - 31/10/2011 02:36:53 PM 722 Views
Re: The trouble is ... Camilla - 31/10/2011 02:44:15 PM 685 Views
Re: The trouble is ... Nate - 31/10/2011 02:52:44 PM 677 Views
Re: The trouble is ... Camilla - 31/10/2011 02:58:06 PM 933 Views
Re: The trouble is ... TaskmasterJack - 01/11/2011 01:21:37 AM 631 Views
I disagree strongly; that segregated power was part of the problem with wotmania chat. Joel - 31/10/2011 10:51:33 PM 692 Views
Agreed *NM* Camilla - 31/10/2011 06:39:28 AM 342 Views
You can always do AIM. Joel - 31/10/2011 10:27:13 PM 683 Views
There is the Invite Only chat. Very restrictive. TaskmasterJack - 01/11/2011 01:26:58 AM 708 Views
I didn't want to be in your racist chat anyway. *NM* Nate - 01/11/2011 02:52:54 AM 335 Views
What if we added a separate Canadian drinking fountain? TaskmasterJack - 01/11/2011 11:36:16 PM 645 Views
While you are at it... Jacob - 02/11/2011 01:17:33 PM 653 Views
*NM* TaskmasterJack - 02/11/2011 11:00:21 PM 315 Views
There was that one time though... Jacob - 01/11/2011 12:21:08 PM 638 Views
You paint a very rockin' picture... even if Minnesotans are just slightly warmer Canadians. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 01/11/2011 11:37:58 PM 337 Views
Hey!!! Well, that's true... though it hasn't snowed here YET. Jacob - 02/11/2011 01:16:43 PM 634 Views
And it better not any time soon *NM* Hieshyn - 07/11/2011 06:38:59 PM 347 Views
Why not an IRC channel? Two Wongs - 01/11/2011 02:02:42 AM 649 Views
I've been advocating this for quite literally years now. *NM* Ghavrel - 01/11/2011 12:06:29 PM 334 Views
Yeah, some of us liked the drama threads *NM* ßelals Girl - 01/11/2011 06:39:38 PM 343 Views
Danu - there is always AIM chat. Everyone knows how to get there. They just don't. Amyrlin - 01/11/2011 01:14:37 PM 724 Views
Hi you! Leggs - 14/11/2011 04:01:15 AM 682 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes