Minor addendum: it seems to be a defective fourth declension. The plural should still be Iesūs.
Tom Send a noteboard - 01/11/2011 10:44:08 PM
The genitive and dative forms are irregular, probably due to following the Greek, and are both Iesu (from Greek Ιησου, which appears to have an irregular dative identical to the genitive). However, it is certainly considered fourth declension (and second declension in Greek, along the general pattern of νους).
The full declension should be:
Nom. Iesus/Iesūs
Gen. Iesu/Iesuum
Dat. Iesu/Iesubus
Acc. Iesum/Iesūs
Abl. Iesu/Iesubus
I avoided the -ibus variant based on the singular forms which have an overdominating "u".
The full declension should be:
Nom. Iesus/Iesūs
Gen. Iesu/Iesuum
Dat. Iesu/Iesubus
Acc. Iesum/Iesūs
Abl. Iesu/Iesubus
I avoided the -ibus variant based on the singular forms which have an overdominating "u".
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius
Ummaka qinnassa nīk!
*MySmiley*
This message last edited by Tom on 02/11/2011 at 01:05:15 AM
It's so weird trying to explain Halloween to people who didn't grow up with it
- 01/11/2011 02:26:52 PM
761 Views
For a sec I was gonna go into the specifics for you...
- 01/11/2011 04:32:18 PM
387 Views
But its always just been an excuse to make a fire on the top of a hill.
- 01/11/2011 05:32:57 PM
377 Views
Yup. I know there are various pagan origins, but honestly, fuck'em
- 01/11/2011 08:17:12 PM
382 Views
I'm not going to do a history lesson, but...
- 01/11/2011 09:22:59 PM
408 Views
What would you say is the proper plural form of Jesus?
- 01/11/2011 09:51:31 PM
415 Views
Claudii is an established plural, actually.
- 01/11/2011 10:02:52 PM
484 Views
I want to reread Lamb: The story of Biff, Christ's Childhood Pal now
- 01/11/2011 11:38:26 PM
489 Views
Jesī *NM*
- 01/11/2011 10:06:29 PM
216 Views
Minor addendum: it seems to be a defective fourth declension. The plural should still be Iesūs.
- 01/11/2011 10:44:08 PM
374 Views
He is singular in nature 
- 01/11/2011 10:08:43 PM
406 Views
- 01/11/2011 10:08:43 PM
406 Views
I thing attempting to discuss the plurality of Jesus precludes any serious discussion
- 01/11/2011 10:41:01 PM
346 Views
Well, Zombie Jesus seems a legit matter for theological discussions
- 02/11/2011 01:03:38 AM
323 Views
Lots of Mexican guys in one room could still be "Jesuses". *NM*
- 01/11/2011 10:47:03 PM
125 Views
So is it Jesūs, Jesii, or Jesuses then?
- 02/11/2011 01:04:58 AM
324 Views
Well, in English I'd assume it's Jesuses. In Latin it would be Iesūs.
- 02/11/2011 01:06:09 AM
342 Views
As I mentioned above, the Latin plural would not be Jesi, but Jesūs.
- 01/11/2011 10:46:18 PM
328 Views
Halloween isn't a Christian holiday, at least not originally.
- 01/11/2011 10:26:58 PM
396 Views
I know all of this, and care not.
- 01/11/2011 11:37:12 PM
303 Views
Again halloween is a world thing, not US property
- 02/11/2011 12:01:25 AM
336 Views
Not according to the Defense of Halloween Act of 1997! We own all IP rights and residuals.
- 02/11/2011 01:12:22 AM
346 Views
Pagans and Satanists care a great deal about religion around Halloween.
- 02/11/2011 01:10:42 AM
346 Views
All Saints' Day is huge in New Orleans, as well. Lots of replastering and whitewashing cemeteries. *NM*
- 02/11/2011 02:14:40 AM
136 Views
*NM*
It seems internationally understood from what I can tell.
- 01/11/2011 10:48:02 PM
366 Views
Aren't morbid celebrations to ward away spirits pretty common throughout the world? *NM*
- 01/11/2011 11:20:45 PM
151 Views
That's not what Halloween is in the US, though. Not anymore. *NM*
- 01/11/2011 11:34:27 PM
138 Views