Active Users:1117 Time:16/09/2025 07:32:37 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
It depends on if that's a realistic example or a toy example. Dreaded Anomaly Send a noteboard - 04/12/2011 05:32:34 PM
In the stereotypical example of reaching into a bag full of green and red marbles and withdrawing a marble, what's the proper representation of probability that the marble will be green or red? Do probabilistic functions like that just have limits approaching 100%?


In toy examples of probabilistic situations, we can consider all the information known, and then 100% seems like a legitimate probability. In reality, though, there is always some chance (maybe exponentially tiny, but still there) that we have some of the information wrong: maybe a cosmic ray hit one of our neurons, or one of our friends gave us a marble that spontaneously changes color just to mess with us. In this case, log-odds will helpfully differentiate between "very confident" and "infinitely confident." The amount of evidence we have is, by necessity, finite, so we must always leave room for our confidence to decrease when we get new information.

A few references for log-odds:
http://www.ncssm.edu/courses/math/Talks/PDFS/LOGODDS.pdf
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/34547557/log-probability.pdf

The first one uses an example of picking marbles to determine which of two barrels we have, if the distributions of marbles within the barrels is "known." The idea of "(deci)bels of evidence" becomes useful when considering this formulation.
Reply to message
Scooby Doo and Secular Humanism. Stephen - 02/12/2011 09:58:49 PM 744 Views
Paraphrasing G.K. Chestertons famous affirmation of Christianity to justify secular humanism, eh? Joel - 02/12/2011 11:02:54 PM 457 Views
Love has nothing to do with spirituality or the supernatural; there is no universal meaning of life. Dreaded Anomaly - 03/12/2011 04:33:13 AM 526 Views
Those are legitimate beliefs, but not proven facts. Joel - 03/12/2011 10:05:44 PM 533 Views
Quite a combination of impossible standards, artificial categories, and misunderstandings of science Dreaded Anomaly - 04/12/2011 02:53:44 AM 534 Views
I have a question about log-odds formulation. Ghavrel - 04/12/2011 06:36:02 AM 320 Views
It depends on if that's a realistic example or a toy example. Dreaded Anomaly - 04/12/2011 05:32:34 PM 370 Views
That's pretty much what I thought. I meant in a toy example. Ghavrel - 04/12/2011 10:17:47 PM 317 Views
That's how I would use it, anyway. Dreaded Anomaly - 04/12/2011 10:41:01 PM 324 Views
Indeed Joel - 05/12/2011 11:05:41 PM 474 Views
Re: Indeed Dreaded Anomaly - 08/12/2011 02:25:13 AM 493 Views
Scooby Doo is not about secular fucking humanism. It's a Gnostic allegory. Tom - 02/12/2011 11:57:37 PM 413 Views
I had all but forgotten that post, one of the first I read at wotmania. Joel - 03/12/2011 10:09:36 PM 344 Views
Comparing me to Santa selling crack has positively made my day. Thank you! Tom - 05/12/2011 01:50:54 AM 464 Views
Not you, Scooby. Joel - 05/12/2011 11:09:45 PM 342 Views
Great article. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 03/12/2011 04:57:50 AM 233 Views
Scooby Doo, Secular Humanism or Gnostic allegory? Danu - 04/12/2011 12:36:09 AM 710 Views
You are welcome *NM* Stephen - 04/12/2011 01:50:41 AM 135 Views
but if you think about it Yunalesca - 04/12/2011 01:03:58 PM 333 Views
Have you seen the Tim Minchin video/song? Camilla - 04/12/2011 06:36:48 PM 441 Views
Look at the thread above this one. *NM* Dreaded Anomaly - 04/12/2011 06:59:40 PM 151 Views
What Dreaded Anomaly said *NM* Stephen - 04/12/2011 08:01:52 PM 160 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes