Log-odds is generally for modelling reality instead of hypothetical systems, then?
It's going to be useful in any system where you're trying to reason with limited information (and hopefully doing Bayesian updating). That could include a hypothetical like the two barrels full of marbles, when we're trying to figure out which barrel we have by withdrawing only a small sample of marbles. Obviously, in the simpler example with one barrel and absolutely known numbers of each type of marble, log-odds of withdrawing a red marble will go to infinity if we happen to withdraw all the green marbles first.
Scooby Doo and Secular Humanism.
- 02/12/2011 09:58:49 PM
789 Views
Paraphrasing G.K. Chestertons famous affirmation of Christianity to justify secular humanism, eh?
- 02/12/2011 11:02:54 PM
496 Views
Love has nothing to do with spirituality or the supernatural; there is no universal meaning of life.
- 03/12/2011 04:33:13 AM
561 Views
Those are legitimate beliefs, but not proven facts.
- 03/12/2011 10:05:44 PM
570 Views
Quite a combination of impossible standards, artificial categories, and misunderstandings of science
- 04/12/2011 02:53:44 AM
574 Views
I have a question about log-odds formulation.
- 04/12/2011 06:36:02 AM
344 Views
It depends on if that's a realistic example or a toy example.
- 04/12/2011 05:32:34 PM
398 Views
That's pretty much what I thought. I meant in a toy example.
- 04/12/2011 10:17:47 PM
339 Views
That's how I would use it, anyway.
- 04/12/2011 10:41:01 PM
351 Views
Scooby Doo is not about secular fucking humanism. It's a Gnostic allegory.
- 02/12/2011 11:57:37 PM
447 Views
I had all but forgotten that post, one of the first I read at wotmania.
- 03/12/2011 10:09:36 PM
373 Views
Comparing me to Santa selling crack has positively made my day. Thank you!
- 05/12/2011 01:50:54 AM
499 Views
- 05/12/2011 01:50:54 AM
499 Views


*NM*
*NM*