Active Users:363 Time:03/07/2025 07:51:12 PM
Why? Joel Send a noteboard - 27/01/2012 04:15:28 PM
I also reject, along with many Christians, the notion that the "Great Commission" is "incumbent on all Christians" rather than just on the first Christians. However, I will agree that Evangelicals often have only the most superficial understanding of faith.

You can argue all you want to, but you won't change the meaning of the phrase.

How is someone now sharing the gospel with those unaware of it any less an evangelist than John was? According to the linked definition the answer is "not at all." Turns out the Mormons actually have positions called "evangelists." So Romney is not an "evangelical" but holds the title of "evangelist." Make of that what you will.

As far as whether the Great Commission has enduring or extensive weight, I cannot see how any Christian would not be obligated to share the gospel with those ignorant of it. Likewise, an obligation to demonstrate it, and explain it given the opportunity (but not shove it in peoples faces,) remains almost inevitable given how poorly it is generally understood.
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.

Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!

LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Link.
This message last edited by Joel on 27/01/2012 at 04:16:14 PM
Reply to message
/politics. And I STILL don't get the Evangelical Right. - 26/01/2012 04:49:54 PM 670 Views
I cannot speak for them, but it seems like Gingrichs infidelity is old news. - 26/01/2012 05:31:01 PM 498 Views
Roman emperors routinely sent out ευαγγελια. - 26/01/2012 10:30:30 PM 335 Views
Fine as far as it goes, but the exclusive use made of it today is something more. - 27/01/2012 10:49:42 AM 521 Views
"Evangelist" can only be used with respect to the writers of the Gospels. - 27/01/2012 02:24:44 PM 344 Views
Why? - 27/01/2012 04:15:28 PM 460 Views
Apparently I no longer know how to post. *NM* - 27/01/2012 10:55:10 AM 117 Views
Maybe they think the other options are worse? - 26/01/2012 07:42:22 PM 313 Views
Because he's a loudmouth. - 26/01/2012 09:03:35 PM 499 Views
Does it ever make you wonder if your model for conseratives is flawed? *NM* - 26/01/2012 09:15:37 PM 139 Views
He admitted precisely that. *NM* - 26/01/2012 09:49:30 PM 117 Views
not really - 26/01/2012 10:04:27 PM 432 Views
I study religion in the south. - 27/01/2012 12:24:11 AM 487 Views
But most of the South is probably not as religious as the people you work with - 27/01/2012 02:12:28 PM 429 Views
Gingrich has stated that he "asked the Lord for forgiveness" on that matter. - 26/01/2012 10:25:04 PM 327 Views
So did Clinton. - 27/01/2012 12:27:40 AM 455 Views
Clinton didn't get in trouble for the BJ he got in trouble for the perjury - 27/01/2012 03:14:19 PM 315 Views
Clinton got in trouble for being president. - 27/01/2012 05:15:50 PM 503 Views
So you agree he was charged with pejury but you continue to act like you don't - 27/01/2012 06:25:09 PM 312 Views
Many people are charged with but acquitted of many things. - 27/01/2012 07:43:49 PM 445 Views

Reply to Message