And give me a break; apparently the ruling is only, like, two weeks old. I did find a Forbes article on it just now that is interesting though. Enough so that I cannot decide whether I agree more with Scalias (!) majority opinion or the concurring ones offered by the courts liberals (and Alito (!!))
Honorbound and honored to be Bonded to Mahtaliel Sedai
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Last First in wotmania Chat
Slightly better than chocolate.
Love still can't be coerced.
Please Don't Eat the Newbies!
LoL. Be well, RAFOlk.
Upcoming Chicago G8 Summit Focuses Attention on Illinois First Amendment Infringement
- 03/02/2012 12:20:25 AM
1193 Views
police officiers have nothing to fear fromvideo taping? Sorry Joel but that is pure crap
- 03/02/2012 01:01:51 AM
737 Views
There's a simple solution to this
- 03/02/2012 02:38:05 AM
672 Views
would you take a job where your ever move was captured on tape?
- 03/02/2012 02:59:46 AM
769 Views
I have had two, that I recall off the top of my head; SOME of us are NOT too good for some jobs. 
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
626 Views
- 03/02/2012 03:11:29 AM
626 Views
yes so we would end up with people like you as cops, thanks for making my point
- 03/02/2012 04:09:54 AM
603 Views
So if your point is invalid the problem is me; glad to see you are being objective here.
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
565 Views
- 03/02/2012 04:23:03 AM
565 Views
If there were mobs of anger idiots looking set up situation where you could be defaimed
- 03/02/2012 04:50:36 AM
653 Views
If it makes you feel better, Rod Blagojevich agrees context ALWAYS exonerates ANYTHING.
- 03/02/2012 07:24:55 AM
830 Views
I'm not asking them to wear them when they go home for the day
- 03/02/2012 05:20:42 AM
692 Views
that is just Big Brother for thee but not for me
- 03/02/2012 05:45:02 PM
758 Views
This started from the banning of video taping things happening in public
- 03/02/2012 08:22:22 PM
701 Views
There are lots of jobs like that
- 03/02/2012 06:19:21 AM
722 Views
and how many of those cameras are controlled by activist looking to smear them?
- 03/02/2012 05:35:32 PM
791 Views
Isn't this already the case with many police officers / departments?
- 03/02/2012 01:02:25 PM
630 Views
Yes and no; in many cases they can and do turn off the cameras when it suits them.
- 03/02/2012 02:33:32 PM
792 Views
I have a job that does that. *NM*
- 03/02/2012 04:37:44 PM
255 Views
a lot of jobs monitor and area but very an individual to wear a camera *NM*
- 03/02/2012 05:47:59 PM
263 Views
Write a sentence that can be understood and maybe I'll reply with something relevant. *NM*
- 04/02/2012 04:57:27 PM
234 Views
i can't tell if you're making a point or just stupid....
- 03/02/2012 02:42:11 AM
662 Views
luck for my job isn't so hard. Judging you as stupid is an easy call
- 03/02/2012 03:46:12 AM
719 Views
The pepper spraying? That is the best you can do?
- 03/02/2012 02:54:43 AM
918 Views
OK I see the problem and it is rampant ignorance
- 03/02/2012 04:33:47 AM
741 Views
I think we could find a middle ground
- 03/02/2012 06:06:32 AM
628 Views
I agree there should be some middle ground
- 03/02/2012 05:26:33 PM
658 Views
Um, HELLO, it is a felony for journalists to tape police in IL, too.
- 03/02/2012 07:16:15 PM
675 Views
That is definitely the problem, though casting aspersions on everyone you can think of hurts, too.
- 03/02/2012 06:55:30 AM
858 Views
unfortunately most cops seem to want a double standard
- 03/02/2012 02:39:01 AM
648 Views
Ah; I did not realize the SCOTUS had overturned that.
- 03/02/2012 03:05:12 AM
603 Views
9-0 decision -- where were you?
- 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM
692 Views
- 03/02/2012 06:53:56 AM
692 Views
Um, Norway? 
- 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM
676 Views
- 03/02/2012 07:08:11 AM
676 Views
Well, public or private, one does not leave one's right to privacy at the door
- 03/02/2012 05:19:12 PM
642 Views