Active Users:1114 Time:25/09/2026 04:32:55 PM
who? *NM* jh Send a noteboard - 11/03/2012 12:00:13 AM
"People think it must be fun to be a super genius, but they don't realize how hard it is to put up with all the idiots in the world" - Calvin.
Reply to message
Atheism: The Iconoclasm of the West? - 10/03/2012 05:42:56 AM 1614 Views
I think about as highly of athiesm as I do of christianity. *NM* - 10/03/2012 05:54:20 AM 511 Views
I would chide you on that basis for having a love/hate relationship with God, but who does not? - 10/03/2012 06:05:11 AM 827 Views
If the divine made men... - 10/03/2012 06:27:42 AM 839 Views
True, but by the same token, in denying our nature we deny the divine. - 10/03/2012 06:57:40 AM 841 Views
I was actually just saying in Skype this is the first post you've made in a long time I've enjoyed. - 10/03/2012 07:02:56 AM 868 Views
Thanks? It is all Dans fault, really. - 10/03/2012 07:21:19 AM 1128 Views
But you do comparable things all the time! - 10/03/2012 08:35:31 AM 1054 Views
You've made this analogy before and it's still a bad one, those aren't comparable - 10/03/2012 03:43:08 PM 960 Views
You said what I was thinking far more respectfully than I probably would have. - 11/03/2012 12:14:55 AM 908 Views
... and apparently it was a waste of time - 11/03/2012 03:27:04 AM 844 Views
Perhaps he just missed it in all my spam? - 11/03/2012 04:59:31 AM 883 Views
Basically what Isaac said. *NM* - 10/03/2012 07:22:07 PM 443 Views
who? *NM* - 11/03/2012 12:00:13 AM 430 Views
Me - 11/03/2012 03:31:51 AM 888 Views
You're right and wrong. - 10/03/2012 05:09:32 PM 1330 Views
Re: You're right and wrong. - 11/03/2012 12:28:25 AM 1214 Views
Nope, Buddhists are explicitly atheist and also explicitly Ontologically engaged - 11/03/2012 01:39:20 AM 1190 Views
Actually, Buddhists are not explicitly atheist in the conventional sense of the world. - 11/03/2012 02:42:36 AM 1022 Views
Yeah, that's very true. - 11/03/2012 03:27:09 PM 1102 Views
My Buddhist readings are definitely Tibet-focused. - 11/03/2012 04:00:17 PM 1156 Views
Duplicate post *NM* - 11/03/2012 03:28:58 PM 544 Views
What exactly do you mean by "The irreparable damage it inflicted in the Great Schism"? - 10/03/2012 07:57:59 PM 1005 Views
That Byzantiums iconoclasm was one of the many wedges between it and Rome that led to the Schism. - 11/03/2012 12:27:05 AM 934 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 01:54:07 AM 1044 Views
I did not say it was decisive, but that it did irreparable damage to the relationship. - 11/03/2012 04:23:43 AM 1045 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 04:30:08 AM 913 Views
It is not like I just pulled it out of my rear, any more than my HS history text or Wikipedia did. - 11/03/2012 04:57:31 AM 967 Views
Bull. Shit. - 11/03/2012 05:14:01 AM 1036 Views
Irreparable damage is damage that cannot be repaired, not necessarily serious or fatal. - 11/03/2012 10:34:57 AM 1097 Views
ο κοπρος. του ταυρου. - 11/03/2012 02:19:11 PM 1083 Views
Very edifying; can you do Mandarin or Swahili next? - 12/03/2012 05:47:23 PM 986 Views
No. Even English seems to be beyond your grasp. - 12/03/2012 06:29:50 PM 896 Views
Citing scripture does not justify telling me to kill myself. - 13/03/2012 12:08:02 AM 1052 Views
I'm not telling you to; God is. - 13/03/2012 12:35:45 AM 796 Views
Or can only you use that sort of specious logic? *NM* - 13/03/2012 03:50:20 PM 405 Views
And re: particular bullshit - 11/03/2012 02:33:15 PM 1011 Views
Re: And re: particular bullshit - 13/03/2012 12:07:42 AM 913 Views
Give it up already. You are wrong. - 12/03/2012 12:53:37 AM 1192 Views

Reply to Message