... and if you don't recognize me you either have something very screwy with your site settings or you blocked me out at some point and forgot, if the latter do let me know so I know not to spend time replying to your remarks.
Atheism: The Iconoclasm of the West?
- 10/03/2012 05:42:56 AM
1633 Views
I think about as highly of athiesm as I do of christianity. *NM*
- 10/03/2012 05:54:20 AM
518 Views
I would chide you on that basis for having a love/hate relationship with God, but who does not? 
- 10/03/2012 06:05:11 AM
867 Views
- 10/03/2012 06:05:11 AM
867 Views
If the divine made men...
- 10/03/2012 06:27:42 AM
873 Views
True, but by the same token, in denying our nature we deny the divine.
- 10/03/2012 06:57:40 AM
857 Views
I was actually just saying in Skype this is the first post you've made in a long time I've enjoyed.
- 10/03/2012 07:02:56 AM
888 Views
It is all Dans fault, really.
But you do comparable things all the time!
- 10/03/2012 08:35:31 AM
1078 Views
You've made this analogy before and it's still a bad one, those aren't comparable
- 10/03/2012 03:43:08 PM
984 Views
You said what I was thinking far more respectfully than I probably would have.
- 11/03/2012 12:14:55 AM
925 Views
You're right and wrong.
- 10/03/2012 05:09:32 PM
1373 Views
Re: You're right and wrong.
- 11/03/2012 12:28:25 AM
1232 Views
Nope, Buddhists are explicitly atheist and also explicitly Ontologically engaged
- 11/03/2012 01:39:20 AM
1208 Views
Actually, Buddhists are not explicitly atheist in the conventional sense of the world.
- 11/03/2012 02:42:36 AM
1049 Views
I guess it is that old impersonalism that seems the great disappointment in most Eastern religions.
- 11/03/2012 04:48:54 AM
1125 Views
What you talkin' 'bout, Willis? *NM*
- 10/03/2012 06:29:35 PM
451 Views
I think he's saying that most arguments used on behalf of Atheism actually come from the Bible.
- 10/03/2012 06:58:50 PM
991 Views
Basically what Dan said; atheism as iconoclasm sans icons (unless we count religion as symbolism.)
- 11/03/2012 12:46:52 AM
978 Views
What exactly do you mean by "The irreparable damage it inflicted in the Great Schism"?
- 10/03/2012 07:57:59 PM
1025 Views
That Byzantiums iconoclasm was one of the many wedges between it and Rome that led to the Schism.
- 11/03/2012 12:27:05 AM
952 Views
Bull. Shit.
- 11/03/2012 01:54:07 AM
1065 Views
I did not say it was decisive, but that it did irreparable damage to the relationship.
- 11/03/2012 04:23:43 AM
1083 Views
Bull. Shit.
- 11/03/2012 04:30:08 AM
934 Views
It is not like I just pulled it out of my rear, any more than my HS history text or Wikipedia did.
- 11/03/2012 04:57:31 AM
986 Views
Bull. Shit.
- 11/03/2012 05:14:01 AM
1062 Views
Irreparable damage is damage that cannot be repaired, not necessarily serious or fatal.
- 11/03/2012 10:34:57 AM
1117 Views
Mierda.del.Toro
- 11/03/2012 12:36:59 PM
1039 Views
1969 may be "sometime back" in Roman Catholic history,but is ~a millenium after the time in question
- 12/03/2012 05:47:11 PM
1384 Views
You really must get steamed by anyone calling you out on your hyberbolic comments
- 12/03/2012 06:55:06 PM
1149 Views
On the contrary, I am not the one screaming "bullshit" in as many languages as possible.
- 13/03/2012 12:07:54 AM
1225 Views
ο κοπρος. του ταυρου.
- 11/03/2012 02:19:11 PM
1108 Views
Very edifying; can you do Mandarin or Swahili next?
- 12/03/2012 05:47:23 PM
1013 Views
No. Even English seems to be beyond your grasp.
- 12/03/2012 06:29:50 PM
916 Views
Citing scripture does not justify telling me to kill myself.
- 13/03/2012 12:08:02 AM
1070 Views
Give it up already. You are wrong.
- 12/03/2012 12:53:37 AM
1214 Views
I will do the former at least; pretty sure this "discussion" has reached rock bottom.
- 13/03/2012 12:12:46 AM
900 Views
More or less your last line
- 11/03/2012 01:37:42 AM
938 Views
That is a broader argument, but more consistent with iconoclasms established meaning.
- 11/03/2012 05:12:12 AM
1099 Views
Would you include the iconoclasm that Joel cites in the canonical Judeo-Christian tradition as well?
- 11/03/2012 12:44:49 PM
952 Views