Active Users:1264 Time:16/12/2025 10:59:39 PM
It's frightening when I agree with you. Tom Send a noteboard - 10/04/2012 02:52:23 PM
I pretty much agree with most of what you said there, though.

I would also add that, as much as Democratic "disenfranchisement" arguments disgust me, the linked video in this original post is probably conveniently ignoring one very important proof of identity: the person's signature. If DC is anything like New York, what that person was asking him to do in order to get a ballot was sign the book. Since a copy of the signature is already there, printed out, the person would then compare the two signatures. If they weren't similar, the person at the polling site would likely report potential voter fraud (and the guy in the video would have just shot the evidence needed to put him in jail).

As a result, you need to know the name, the address and be able to fake the signature of the person you're trying to vote for. Not impossible for some, but a lot harder than it looks and certainly not something that crazy homeless people are going to be able to accomplish.

In short, though, free ID cards = solution.
Political correctness is the pettiest form of casuistry.

ἡ δὲ κἀκ τριῶν τρυπημάτων ἐργαζομένη ἐνεκάλει τῇ φύσει, δυσφορουμένη, ὅτι δὴ μὴ καὶ τοὺς τιτθοὺς αὐτῇ εὐρύτερον ἢ νῦν εἰσι τρυπώη, ὅπως καὶ ἄλλην ἐνταῦθα μίξιν ἐπιτεχνᾶσθαι δυνατὴ εἴη. – Procopius

Ummaka qinnassa nīk!

*MySmiley*
Reply to message
No voter fraud Mr. Holder? I beg to differ..... - 09/04/2012 07:13:46 PM 784 Views
The irony of a Republican-leaning person pointing this out... *NM* - 09/04/2012 08:37:33 PM 194 Views
Why is it ironic? - 09/04/2012 09:54:10 PM 528 Views
The irony is merely that of the pot and the kettle - 10/04/2012 01:05:39 AM 420 Views
If you are referring to FL in 2000.....those machines were bought by Dems..... - 10/04/2012 01:17:26 AM 400 Views
Was thinking more about Ohio to be honest - 10/04/2012 01:22:55 AM 411 Views
Intentional Voting Suppression is what they are trying to do in Florida right now(due to a 2011 law) - 10/04/2012 04:22:25 AM 577 Views
Honestly, I'm fine with convicted felons permanently losing their right to vote..... - 10/04/2012 04:34:31 AM 386 Views
I am also fine with stupid people not being allowed to vote - 10/04/2012 04:36:20 AM 362 Views
Agreed - stupid people should not be allowed to vote, maybe an IQ test? - 10/04/2012 05:17:43 AM 355 Views
Also the poor should not be allowed to vote - 10/04/2012 10:13:27 PM 375 Views
Hey, to jump in here. - 18/04/2012 04:12:15 AM 357 Views
I don't know about permanently... - 10/04/2012 02:10:10 PM 385 Views
Who is talking about letting felons vote in prison? - 10/04/2012 02:24:29 PM 465 Views
The League of Women Voters, for one - 10/04/2012 08:50:39 PM 378 Views
Ohio? When? *NM* - 10/04/2012 04:30:29 AM 150 Views
2008. - 10/04/2012 04:37:15 AM 359 Views
Once again, Dems were running those polls and counties. - 10/04/2012 05:19:14 AM 336 Views
they were not in 2004 and still had vote supression and irregularities - 10/04/2012 04:44:36 PM 367 Views
I think you've got your facts wrong - 10/04/2012 09:00:55 PM 374 Views
Stating something doesn't make it true - 10/04/2012 04:10:33 AM 409 Views
I'm impressed that you wrote so much in reply - 10/04/2012 04:36:02 AM 380 Views
How long voting takes is a function of machines, not voters. - 10/04/2012 02:08:39 PM 452 Views
It's a function of various factors, that can certainly be one - 10/04/2012 08:12:08 PM 405 Views
Ohio in 2004 was hinky enough to prompt the only Congressional challenge since 1876s Corrupt Bargain - 10/04/2012 11:36:52 PM 545 Views
I know it's a bit pot/kettle but dude... stay on topic - 11/04/2012 01:34:26 AM 430 Views
I LOST PORKINS! - 11/04/2012 07:26:41 AM 456 Views
As long as people need not purchase their voting requirements, voter IDs are fine by me. - 10/04/2012 12:53:35 PM 463 Views
It's frightening when I agree with you. - 10/04/2012 02:52:23 PM 384 Views
Law of averages, maybe. - 10/04/2012 04:44:55 PM 520 Views

Reply to Message