Active Users:681 Time:16/06/2026 02:17:09 AM
Re: Nate Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 02:19:07 PM
Dr No (I was sure the first book was Casino Royale but Dr No was the first film)


I thought Isaac must know about some film version of Casino Royale that was done before Dr. No. But I just looked it up, and the only film versions of Casino Royale are the 2003 version and a 1967 Bond spoof (Dr. No was 1962). A television episode based on Casino Royale was done in 1954 ... but the question said it was a movie.

However, I just realized that the question is probably just not worded the way we're reading it. We're reading it as "original book and original movie", when it's saying "original book and any movie". So that's what threw us off.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Test Your Geekdom, Vol IX: You Bet Your Life - 22/04/2012 09:39:44 PM 1195 Views
The Answers - 22/04/2012 09:56:35 PM 733 Views
*Duplicate* *NM* - 22/04/2012 09:56:35 PM 331 Views
I'm claiming 13 points, although one of them is a different answer than yours. - 22/04/2012 10:58:45 PM 720 Views
I'd acknowledge that alternative as valid - 22/04/2012 11:16:57 PM 690 Views
17 for me. - 22/04/2012 11:15:42 PM 713 Views
We do not HAVE a "ch" sound. - 22/05/2012 11:29:03 PM 700 Views
I got 18. - 23/04/2012 04:20:53 AM 785 Views
There were actually TWO "Casino Royale" movies. - 22/05/2012 11:46:03 PM 870 Views
Let's see: 15 1/2 - 23/04/2012 01:26:51 PM 778 Views
Re: - 23/04/2012 02:19:07 PM 727 Views
It's very bad wording on my part, cleaned it up *NM* - 23/04/2012 03:15:57 PM 325 Views
Umm you sure about #3? - 23/04/2012 03:36:52 PM 771 Views
Actually no, I must be off my game, that's two ambigous/wrong bits in the quiz - 23/04/2012 03:45:56 PM 709 Views
Huh. - 23/04/2012 03:57:32 PM 703 Views
Yeah it would have been cooler, mental-edit probably - 23/04/2012 04:20:26 PM 734 Views
I think RJ had it ripped off to call the readers' attention to it *NM* - 23/04/2012 09:25:29 PM 374 Views
11, that's half - 23/04/2012 09:05:56 PM 743 Views
17, better than I expected, actually. - 22/05/2012 11:04:07 PM 811 Views

Reply to Message