Active Users:923 Time:21/04/2026 10:46:07 AM
Re: Nate Send a noteboard - 23/04/2012 02:19:07 PM
Dr No (I was sure the first book was Casino Royale but Dr No was the first film)


I thought Isaac must know about some film version of Casino Royale that was done before Dr. No. But I just looked it up, and the only film versions of Casino Royale are the 2003 version and a 1967 Bond spoof (Dr. No was 1962). A television episode based on Casino Royale was done in 1954 ... but the question said it was a movie.

However, I just realized that the question is probably just not worded the way we're reading it. We're reading it as "original book and original movie", when it's saying "original book and any movie". So that's what threw us off.
Warder to starry_nite

Chapterfish — Nate's Writing Blog
http://chapterfish.wordpress.com
Reply to message
Test Your Geekdom, Vol IX: You Bet Your Life - 22/04/2012 09:39:44 PM 1152 Views
The Answers - 22/04/2012 09:56:35 PM 693 Views
*Duplicate* *NM* - 22/04/2012 09:56:35 PM 308 Views
I'm claiming 13 points, although one of them is a different answer than yours. - 22/04/2012 10:58:45 PM 685 Views
I'd acknowledge that alternative as valid - 22/04/2012 11:16:57 PM 657 Views
17 for me. - 22/04/2012 11:15:42 PM 685 Views
We do not HAVE a "ch" sound. - 22/05/2012 11:29:03 PM 664 Views
I got 18. - 23/04/2012 04:20:53 AM 745 Views
There were actually TWO "Casino Royale" movies. - 22/05/2012 11:46:03 PM 832 Views
Let's see: 15 1/2 - 23/04/2012 01:26:51 PM 740 Views
Re: - 23/04/2012 02:19:07 PM 688 Views
It's very bad wording on my part, cleaned it up *NM* - 23/04/2012 03:15:57 PM 305 Views
Umm you sure about #3? - 23/04/2012 03:36:52 PM 738 Views
Actually no, I must be off my game, that's two ambigous/wrong bits in the quiz - 23/04/2012 03:45:56 PM 669 Views
Huh. - 23/04/2012 03:57:32 PM 665 Views
Yeah it would have been cooler, mental-edit probably - 23/04/2012 04:20:26 PM 699 Views
I think RJ had it ripped off to call the readers' attention to it *NM* - 23/04/2012 09:25:29 PM 352 Views
11, that's half - 23/04/2012 09:05:56 PM 710 Views
17, better than I expected, actually. - 22/05/2012 11:04:07 PM 774 Views

Reply to Message