Active Users:405 Time:18/06/2025 01:24:01 AM
It isn't brain science... wiat a minute, it actually is... everynametaken Send a noteboard - 27/09/2009 01:18:35 AM
It works between 2 and 6 the best because kids in that age range do not have the cognitive capability to comprehend the ramifications of their behavior the way older children do. In that age range children learn primarily by associations like positive and negative reinforcement and aversion so a spanking WITH an explanation for the punishment as quickly as possible after the behavior to be curbed is VERY effective. The main problem is that parents don't apply the punishment immediately and they don't explain to their kids why they are being punished AND they add on all the verbal bullshit which the kids end up figuring out means they are a piece of shit who deserves violent responses for their actions.

Not lecturing you btw, I know you get it, just explaining the mechanism for anyone else who reads this.
But wine was the great assassin of both tradition and propriety...
-Brandon Sanderson, The Way of Kings
Reply to message
Apparently spanking makes children stupid. - 26/09/2009 12:25:34 PM 1127 Views
Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:34:41 PM 663 Views
Re: Spanking? - 26/09/2009 12:36:24 PM 717 Views
Negative memories aren't all bad. Parents just need to be consistent, yet loving. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:06:07 PM 325 Views
Indeed. *NM* - 26/09/2009 02:41:39 PM 316 Views
I dunno.. - 26/09/2009 02:49:50 PM 666 Views
I do believe this study was created to prove the point, not test it. - 26/09/2009 03:25:54 PM 688 Views
What are your grounds for that belief? - 26/09/2009 04:11:37 PM 692 Views
Duke University is one of the best universities in the United States - 26/09/2009 05:11:21 PM 672 Views
Yeah, I have heard of it. - 26/09/2009 05:56:30 PM 643 Views
I agree with her, and here's why - 26/09/2009 06:28:53 PM 648 Views
You are apparently pretty ignorant about psychology if you think it is pseudo-science. - 27/09/2009 01:09:02 AM 635 Views
Bah. It's not falsifiable. - 27/09/2009 01:09:37 PM 738 Views
Karl Popper had a turquoise willy. Falsify THAT with your CERNomatic juiceharp, Galileo. *NM* - 27/09/2009 03:05:44 PM 306 Views
hehe. *NM* - 27/09/2009 04:24:54 PM 315 Views
I would agree... and... - 27/09/2009 01:45:48 AM 606 Views
More likely their comparing two effects and claiming correlation - 27/09/2009 02:32:42 PM 613 Views
Clearly that's why all of our old people are so stupid. - 26/09/2009 04:09:52 PM 657 Views
No, no, that's just nossy bringing down the average. *NM* - 26/09/2009 04:12:10 PM 318 Views
That's not what the study says. It says don't spank VERY young children - 26/09/2009 05:16:33 PM 766 Views
Hahaha *NM* - 26/09/2009 05:58:01 PM 342 Views
Did I miss something or did I just forget? - 27/09/2009 12:54:13 AM 680 Views
Uh... - 27/09/2009 03:32:03 PM 646 Views
She's a beauty! - 28/09/2009 05:16:36 AM 645 Views
too cute for words! *NM* - 28/09/2009 01:33:29 PM 348 Views
That is also what I got. *NM* - 27/09/2009 12:56:08 AM 315 Views
It isn't brain science... wiat a minute, it actually is... - 27/09/2009 01:18:35 AM 645 Views
Agreed. - 28/09/2009 12:06:29 AM 705 Views
For children that young, I can agree. - 26/09/2009 05:56:41 PM 648 Views
With this too, I agree. ^_^ *NM* - 27/09/2009 01:46:32 AM 286 Views
*rings in* Same. - 04/10/2009 11:55:02 PM 822 Views
Really? - 27/09/2009 01:48:35 AM 700 Views
I must be pretty stupid, then. - 28/09/2009 05:49:26 PM 638 Views
It certainly can make them kinky. *NM* - 28/09/2009 07:19:34 PM 331 Views
It's the old "nature v. nurture" argument again... *NM* - 05/10/2009 06:08:26 PM 253 Views
When the kid has both, it's really screwed over then. *NM* - 05/10/2009 07:48:15 PM 266 Views

Reply to Message