Active Users:517 Time:01/01/2026 10:54:05 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
I only had a problem with that last one too LadyLorraine Send a noteboard - 26/04/2012 03:14:39 AM
the use of literally as the reverse of the word may be common...but so is texting like a moron on a 1990-era Nokia. A common frequency alone doesn't make something right.
Still Empress of the Poofy Purple Pillow Pile Palace!!
Continued Love of my Aussie <3
Reply to message
An article on grammar that makes me want to start a slow movie clap. TaskmasterJack - 26/04/2012 12:26:21 AM 748 Views
I love cracked. nossy - 26/04/2012 01:51:06 AM 354 Views
I almost completely agree with them. Tom - 26/04/2012 02:38:06 AM 478 Views
I only had a problem with that last one too LadyLorraine - 26/04/2012 03:14:39 AM 379 Views
Misusing "Literally" is one of the few grammar issues that actually bothers me. Gher - 26/04/2012 05:18:21 AM 403 Views
I'm with you on all points. Furthermore, misuse of "literally" isn't a grammar issue at all. Tim - 26/04/2012 07:07:11 PM 395 Views
Oh no, I can't use "themself". Tom - 27/04/2012 01:54:15 PM 333 Views
I never did get that fuss about "literally". Legolas - 26/04/2012 08:12:14 PM 452 Views
Your example is slightly different from e.g. "My blood was literally boiling". *NM* Tim - 27/04/2012 02:13:05 PM 167 Views
I used the article's example. But I don't see why your example is any different in that regard. *NM* Legolas - 27/04/2012 07:03:03 PM 147 Views
One's an exaggeration of something that's otherwise true. *NM* Tim - 27/04/2012 07:37:14 PM 141 Views
Yeah, literally in hyperbole doesn't bother me. But I also don't mind when people mock its usage. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 27/04/2012 08:21:05 PM 146 Views
You clearly need to watch more English football coverage, Sky in particular. snoopcester - 28/04/2012 02:01:11 PM 428 Views
It's all about usage. Dannymac - 27/04/2012 04:13:52 PM 358 Views
They provide the wrong rationale for good/well Larry - 26/04/2012 02:55:10 AM 500 Views
Hopefully you be right... hm, I don't know about that one. Legolas - 26/04/2012 08:22:05 PM 348 Views
Sometimes, I do actually use that construction when speaking to others near me Larry - 26/04/2012 09:10:02 PM 357 Views
If I'm not mistaken, the Future Indicative evolved from and replaced some of the Subjunctive. Dan - 27/04/2012 09:44:33 PM 460 Views
There was never an optative in recorded Latin or later Romance languages. Tom - 27/04/2012 09:58:11 PM 356 Views
It's not Ojala which makes me think there's a connection between the Conditional and Optative Dan - 28/04/2012 04:28:35 AM 420 Views
No, the conditional form has no relation to the optative Tom - 28/04/2012 02:23:00 PM 395 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes