I like using "they" as a gender-neutral singular pronoun (provided that the accompanying verb is conjugated in the plural to agree with "they" ), and most of the other points are the same ones that I make regularly (i.e., split infinitives are not mistakes and never have been, there's nothing wrong with the passive voice, you feel good unless you're trying to describe how attuned your tactile senses are, in which case you can say you feel well). However, the misuse of "literally" is really misuse. Cracked can try to put a spin on it, but even they seem to realize that it's pushing the envelope a bit.
I mean, surely we can agree that in the kind of sentence we are talking about here, using "figuratively" instead would be utterly idiotic. Nobody would ever say "He is figuratively the creepiest dude in the universe" (except perhaps to prove a point in this discussion). You either put "literally" or you put nothing at all. So using "literally" there isn't a grammar issue, nor is it a vocabulary issue. It's an exaggeration issue - part of a rather widespread tendency in popular speech to use extreme hyperbole to humorous or emphatic effect. I don't see why that word is singled out any more than the million other ways of doing that (no, that actually wasn't intentional until I read it again and noticed).
An article on grammar that makes me want to start a slow movie clap.
26/04/2012 12:26:21 AM
- 704 Views
I almost completely agree with them.
26/04/2012 02:38:06 AM
- 438 Views
Misusing "Literally" is one of the few grammar issues that actually bothers me.
26/04/2012 05:18:21 AM
- 360 Views
I'm with you on all points. Furthermore, misuse of "literally" isn't a grammar issue at all.
26/04/2012 07:07:11 PM
- 356 Views
I never did get that fuss about "literally".
26/04/2012 08:12:14 PM
- 400 Views
Your example is slightly different from e.g. "My blood was literally boiling". *NM*
27/04/2012 02:13:05 PM
- 146 Views
I used the article's example. But I don't see why your example is any different in that regard. *NM*
27/04/2012 07:03:03 PM
- 129 Views
Yeah, literally in hyperbole doesn't bother me. But I also don't mind when people mock its usage. *NM*
27/04/2012 08:21:05 PM
- 130 Views
You clearly need to watch more English football coverage, Sky in particular.
28/04/2012 02:01:11 PM
- 379 Views
They provide the wrong rationale for good/well
26/04/2012 02:55:10 AM
- 464 Views
Hopefully you be right... hm, I don't know about that one.
26/04/2012 08:22:05 PM
- 310 Views

Sometimes, I do actually use that construction when speaking to others near me
26/04/2012 09:10:02 PM
- 318 Views
If I'm not mistaken, the Future Indicative evolved from and replaced some of the Subjunctive.
27/04/2012 09:44:33 PM
- 401 Views
There was never an optative in recorded Latin or later Romance languages.
27/04/2012 09:58:11 PM
- 318 Views
It's not Ojala which makes me think there's a connection between the Conditional and Optative
28/04/2012 04:28:35 AM
- 363 Views