Active Users:506 Time:18/09/2025 02:19:42 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Your example is slightly different from e.g. "My blood was literally boiling". *NM* Tim Send a noteboard - 27/04/2012 02:13:05 PM
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
An article on grammar that makes me want to start a slow movie clap. TaskmasterJack - 26/04/2012 12:26:21 AM 725 Views
I love cracked. nossy - 26/04/2012 01:51:06 AM 333 Views
I almost completely agree with them. Tom - 26/04/2012 02:38:06 AM 457 Views
I only had a problem with that last one too LadyLorraine - 26/04/2012 03:14:39 AM 359 Views
Misusing "Literally" is one of the few grammar issues that actually bothers me. Gher - 26/04/2012 05:18:21 AM 380 Views
I'm with you on all points. Furthermore, misuse of "literally" isn't a grammar issue at all. Tim - 26/04/2012 07:07:11 PM 372 Views
Oh no, I can't use "themself". Tom - 27/04/2012 01:54:15 PM 314 Views
I never did get that fuss about "literally". Legolas - 26/04/2012 08:12:14 PM 422 Views
Your example is slightly different from e.g. "My blood was literally boiling". *NM* Tim - 27/04/2012 02:13:05 PM 154 Views
I used the article's example. But I don't see why your example is any different in that regard. *NM* Legolas - 27/04/2012 07:03:03 PM 136 Views
One's an exaggeration of something that's otherwise true. *NM* Tim - 27/04/2012 07:37:14 PM 131 Views
Yeah, literally in hyperbole doesn't bother me. But I also don't mind when people mock its usage. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 27/04/2012 08:21:05 PM 138 Views
You clearly need to watch more English football coverage, Sky in particular. snoopcester - 28/04/2012 02:01:11 PM 403 Views
It's all about usage. Dannymac - 27/04/2012 04:13:52 PM 338 Views
They provide the wrong rationale for good/well Larry - 26/04/2012 02:55:10 AM 480 Views
Hopefully you be right... hm, I don't know about that one. Legolas - 26/04/2012 08:22:05 PM 327 Views
Sometimes, I do actually use that construction when speaking to others near me Larry - 26/04/2012 09:10:02 PM 337 Views
If I'm not mistaken, the Future Indicative evolved from and replaced some of the Subjunctive. Dan - 27/04/2012 09:44:33 PM 423 Views
There was never an optative in recorded Latin or later Romance languages. Tom - 27/04/2012 09:58:11 PM 335 Views
It's not Ojala which makes me think there's a connection between the Conditional and Optative Dan - 28/04/2012 04:28:35 AM 385 Views
No, the conditional form has no relation to the optative Tom - 28/04/2012 02:23:00 PM 378 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes