Active Users:703 Time:02/01/2026 12:57:29 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
One's an exaggeration of something that's otherwise true. *NM* Tim Send a noteboard - 27/04/2012 07:37:14 PM
Vigilantibus non dormientibus jura subveniunt.

—Nous disons en allemand : le guerre, le mort, le lune, alors que 'soleil' et 'amour' sont du sexe féminin : la soleil, la amour. La vie est neutre.

—La vie ? Neutre ? C'est très joli, et surtout très logique.
Reply to message
An article on grammar that makes me want to start a slow movie clap. TaskmasterJack - 26/04/2012 12:26:21 AM 750 Views
I love cracked. nossy - 26/04/2012 01:51:06 AM 356 Views
I almost completely agree with them. Tom - 26/04/2012 02:38:06 AM 481 Views
I only had a problem with that last one too LadyLorraine - 26/04/2012 03:14:39 AM 381 Views
Misusing "Literally" is one of the few grammar issues that actually bothers me. Gher - 26/04/2012 05:18:21 AM 406 Views
I'm with you on all points. Furthermore, misuse of "literally" isn't a grammar issue at all. Tim - 26/04/2012 07:07:11 PM 397 Views
Oh no, I can't use "themself". Tom - 27/04/2012 01:54:15 PM 335 Views
I never did get that fuss about "literally". Legolas - 26/04/2012 08:12:14 PM 454 Views
Your example is slightly different from e.g. "My blood was literally boiling". *NM* Tim - 27/04/2012 02:13:05 PM 169 Views
I used the article's example. But I don't see why your example is any different in that regard. *NM* Legolas - 27/04/2012 07:03:03 PM 149 Views
One's an exaggeration of something that's otherwise true. *NM* Tim - 27/04/2012 07:37:14 PM 143 Views
Yeah, literally in hyperbole doesn't bother me. But I also don't mind when people mock its usage. *NM* TaskmasterJack - 27/04/2012 08:21:05 PM 148 Views
You clearly need to watch more English football coverage, Sky in particular. snoopcester - 28/04/2012 02:01:11 PM 430 Views
It's all about usage. Dannymac - 27/04/2012 04:13:52 PM 360 Views
They provide the wrong rationale for good/well Larry - 26/04/2012 02:55:10 AM 502 Views
Hopefully you be right... hm, I don't know about that one. Legolas - 26/04/2012 08:22:05 PM 350 Views
Sometimes, I do actually use that construction when speaking to others near me Larry - 26/04/2012 09:10:02 PM 361 Views
If I'm not mistaken, the Future Indicative evolved from and replaced some of the Subjunctive. Dan - 27/04/2012 09:44:33 PM 462 Views
There was never an optative in recorded Latin or later Romance languages. Tom - 27/04/2012 09:58:11 PM 358 Views
It's not Ojala which makes me think there's a connection between the Conditional and Optative Dan - 28/04/2012 04:28:35 AM 422 Views
No, the conditional form has no relation to the optative Tom - 28/04/2012 02:23:00 PM 398 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes