Active Users:908 Time:15/09/2025 08:30:14 PM
I must have missed the part of him already being convicted. My bad. *NM* Floffe Send a noteboard - 27/09/2009 09:23:01 PM
From wiki: A statute of limitations is a statute in a common law legal system that sets forth the maximum period of time, after certain events, that legal proceedings based on those events may be initiated.

Empahasis on 'initiated', legal proceedings were initiated, that's why someone can't hang up a case in trial for two or three years for the clock to run out. Was the start the clock the trial can go on for years, or the person can flee, doesn't matter.
--- signature starts here ---

I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!

e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
This message last edited by Floffe on 27/09/2009 at 09:23:17 PM
Reply to message
Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland on U.S. Arrest Warrant - 27/09/2009 12:47:16 PM 873 Views
Ignore, this is just a repeat. Thought I hit edit. - 27/09/2009 12:48:31 PM 507 Views
The new website seems to make that more common, at least for me - 27/09/2009 04:33:52 PM 370 Views
And it only took three decades *NM* - 27/09/2009 12:57:40 PM 206 Views
Excellent. Good news. - 27/09/2009 03:28:28 PM 434 Views
Very good - 27/09/2009 04:37:40 PM 434 Views
That point sort of struck me too... - 27/09/2009 04:50:54 PM 393 Views
oh well you know kids these days... - 27/09/2009 05:12:51 PM 435 Views
that'd technically be "those days". *NM* - 27/09/2009 08:21:57 PM 168 Views
Right. - 27/09/2009 08:12:06 PM 424 Views
That's the point that jumps out at me, too. - 27/09/2009 05:01:09 PM 411 Views
This is pointless - 27/09/2009 05:30:01 PM 439 Views
Actually, maybe not. - 27/09/2009 05:56:31 PM 410 Views
true, but - 27/09/2009 08:16:28 PM 454 Views
Doesn't work that way - 27/09/2009 09:17:27 PM 399 Views
I must have missed the part of him already being convicted. My bad. *NM* - 27/09/2009 09:23:01 PM 178 Views
Was I the only one who was shocked when he got a standing ovation at the Oscars awhile back? - 28/09/2009 12:59:23 AM 360 Views
He gets a somewhat skewed sympathy vote from a lot of people because of the murder of his wife - 28/09/2009 01:58:16 AM 531 Views
Well said. - 28/09/2009 04:03:00 AM 442 Views
Yes, - 28/09/2009 12:37:29 PM 424 Views
It's been 30 years. He does not seem to have done it again - 28/09/2009 01:48:26 PM 403 Views
They don't have to try him he plead guility - 28/09/2009 02:43:12 PM 421 Views
Meh. It's been 30 years. - 28/09/2009 04:03:51 PM 433 Views
Did she say she forgave him? - 29/09/2009 01:15:46 AM 419 Views
Yes, she did. *NM* - 29/09/2009 02:54:47 PM 171 Views
After he paid her off I assume? - 29/09/2009 07:06:37 PM 413 Views
We wouldn't be having this discussion if it hadn't been so long. - 29/09/2009 07:46:21 PM 440 Views
Don't you think laws have to stand whether the perp is forgiven by the victim or not? - 29/09/2009 02:58:18 AM 413 Views
No, I don't think it should. - 29/09/2009 02:55:13 PM 419 Views
How long do you have to stay away before you're absolved of murder? - 29/09/2009 02:56:58 AM 382 Views
Murder and sex with a minor are not the same thing. - 29/09/2009 02:54:10 PM 379 Views
I heard a bit more about it this morning - 28/09/2009 03:33:42 PM 370 Views
I'm not saying that sex with 13 year olds is right or anything, but... - 28/09/2009 10:49:29 PM 528 Views
First off, what the hell? - 29/09/2009 06:33:37 AM 392 Views
can't consent when drunk? - 01/10/2009 09:24:39 PM 357 Views
With a 13 year old? Sex is NEVER consensual. - 01/10/2009 09:39:35 PM 371 Views
This too. - 02/10/2009 02:30:45 AM 337 Views
Was I unclear? - 02/10/2009 02:30:30 AM 384 Views
I'm safe - 02/10/2009 07:11:07 PM 372 Views
Good. Point still stands. - 03/10/2009 05:43:12 AM 366 Views
Sorry but you are excusing his action - 29/09/2009 03:54:02 PM 372 Views
Wrong place *NM* - 29/09/2009 07:12:31 PM 165 Views

Reply to Message