Active Users:808 Time:07/11/2025 02:37:46 PM
I must have missed the part of him already being convicted. My bad. *NM* Floffe Send a noteboard - 27/09/2009 09:23:01 PM
From wiki: A statute of limitations is a statute in a common law legal system that sets forth the maximum period of time, after certain events, that legal proceedings based on those events may be initiated.

Empahasis on 'initiated', legal proceedings were initiated, that's why someone can't hang up a case in trial for two or three years for the clock to run out. Was the start the clock the trial can go on for years, or the person can flee, doesn't matter.
--- signature starts here ---

I am the Demon of Delightfulness and Sinister Smirkings!

e^(πi)+1=0
identity named after the Terry Pratchett of 18th century mathematics
This message last edited by Floffe on 27/09/2009 at 09:23:17 PM
Reply to message
Roman Polanski arrested in Switzerland on U.S. Arrest Warrant - 27/09/2009 12:47:16 PM 895 Views
Ignore, this is just a repeat. Thought I hit edit. - 27/09/2009 12:48:31 PM 529 Views
The new website seems to make that more common, at least for me - 27/09/2009 04:33:52 PM 384 Views
And it only took three decades *NM* - 27/09/2009 12:57:40 PM 209 Views
Excellent. Good news. - 27/09/2009 03:28:28 PM 449 Views
Very good - 27/09/2009 04:37:40 PM 447 Views
That point sort of struck me too... - 27/09/2009 04:50:54 PM 406 Views
oh well you know kids these days... - 27/09/2009 05:12:51 PM 447 Views
that'd technically be "those days". *NM* - 27/09/2009 08:21:57 PM 172 Views
Right. - 27/09/2009 08:12:06 PM 440 Views
That's the point that jumps out at me, too. - 27/09/2009 05:01:09 PM 421 Views
This is pointless - 27/09/2009 05:30:01 PM 461 Views
Actually, maybe not. - 27/09/2009 05:56:31 PM 426 Views
true, but - 27/09/2009 08:16:28 PM 470 Views
Doesn't work that way - 27/09/2009 09:17:27 PM 411 Views
I must have missed the part of him already being convicted. My bad. *NM* - 27/09/2009 09:23:01 PM 182 Views
Was I the only one who was shocked when he got a standing ovation at the Oscars awhile back? - 28/09/2009 12:59:23 AM 372 Views
He gets a somewhat skewed sympathy vote from a lot of people because of the murder of his wife - 28/09/2009 01:58:16 AM 548 Views
Well said. - 28/09/2009 04:03:00 AM 453 Views
Yes, - 28/09/2009 12:37:29 PM 437 Views
It's been 30 years. He does not seem to have done it again - 28/09/2009 01:48:26 PM 416 Views
They don't have to try him he plead guility - 28/09/2009 02:43:12 PM 435 Views
Meh. It's been 30 years. - 28/09/2009 04:03:51 PM 447 Views
Did she say she forgave him? - 29/09/2009 01:15:46 AM 431 Views
Yes, she did. *NM* - 29/09/2009 02:54:47 PM 177 Views
After he paid her off I assume? - 29/09/2009 07:06:37 PM 422 Views
We wouldn't be having this discussion if it hadn't been so long. - 29/09/2009 07:46:21 PM 453 Views
Don't you think laws have to stand whether the perp is forgiven by the victim or not? - 29/09/2009 02:58:18 AM 423 Views
No, I don't think it should. - 29/09/2009 02:55:13 PM 433 Views
How long do you have to stay away before you're absolved of murder? - 29/09/2009 02:56:58 AM 395 Views
Murder and sex with a minor are not the same thing. - 29/09/2009 02:54:10 PM 394 Views
I heard a bit more about it this morning - 28/09/2009 03:33:42 PM 382 Views
I'm not saying that sex with 13 year olds is right or anything, but... - 28/09/2009 10:49:29 PM 543 Views
First off, what the hell? - 29/09/2009 06:33:37 AM 408 Views
can't consent when drunk? - 01/10/2009 09:24:39 PM 373 Views
With a 13 year old? Sex is NEVER consensual. - 01/10/2009 09:39:35 PM 385 Views
This too. - 02/10/2009 02:30:45 AM 349 Views
Was I unclear? - 02/10/2009 02:30:30 AM 398 Views
I'm safe - 02/10/2009 07:11:07 PM 385 Views
Good. Point still stands. - 03/10/2009 05:43:12 AM 381 Views
Sorry but you are excusing his action - 29/09/2009 03:54:02 PM 386 Views
Wrong place *NM* - 29/09/2009 07:12:31 PM 170 Views

Reply to Message