i fully understand the position coach k is in having to go out there and actually play the game, lest he be accused of throwing the match. i still completely disagree with fielding a team of nothing but nba superstars solely because of the need to dominate basketball in the olympics.
You say we have NBA players because we "need" to dominate basketball. That is simply wrong. Do you know the reason professionals are allowed in the Olympics in the first place?
yes. to make more money for the olympic games.
"The RIAA has shown a certain disregard for the creative people of the industry in their eagerness to protect the revenues of the record companies." -- Frank Zappa
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
"That's the trouble with political jokes in this country... they get elected!" -- Dave Lippman
/olympics: is it necessary to win a basketball game by 80+ points?
- 03/08/2012 08:39:56 AM
720 Views
Judging by what happened in the badminton, yes it is.
- 03/08/2012 08:45:23 AM
491 Views
yes i know they had to actually play the game to the end, i still find it boring to watch either way
- 03/08/2012 04:06:14 PM
431 Views
Maybe the IOC shouldn't let Nigeria compete if they can't keep up with real countries.
- 03/08/2012 12:12:24 PM
668 Views
My thoughts are they could institutionalise something like the soccer competition
- 03/08/2012 12:51:09 PM
422 Views
Soccer does that on purpose so that the World Cup means a lot more *NM*
- 03/08/2012 03:22:35 PM
202 Views
Football does it *because* the Euro/World Cups mean a lot more. An important distinction. *NM*
- 03/08/2012 07:58:58 PM
196 Views
What Wibble said, and the reason has to do with the amount of competitive teams.
- 03/08/2012 08:25:08 PM
490 Views
Re: Maybe the IOC shouldn't let Nigeria compete if they can't keep up with real countries.
- 03/08/2012 04:28:53 PM
653 Views
So who is stopping the other countries from making their own NBAs if they want to compete?
- 03/08/2012 08:56:46 PM
455 Views
Did you read coach K's response?
- 03/08/2012 03:50:26 PM
509 Views
i saw it this morning after i had already posted the original comment
- 03/08/2012 04:32:08 PM
569 Views
I guess I still don't understand your complaint.
- 03/08/2012 06:17:05 PM
490 Views
my main objection is how the olympics are now nothing more than an extension of pro leagues
- 04/08/2012 05:39:08 PM
422 Views
You'd have us kick out every Olympian other than the boxers, then?
- 04/08/2012 06:00:08 PM
412 Views
no, i'd have the olympics be more about sport and less about money
- 04/08/2012 06:12:24 PM
430 Views
"Need"
- 03/08/2012 06:17:26 PM
435 Views
Re: "Need"
- 04/08/2012 05:53:39 PM
457 Views
No. Do you want to know, really? Your tone throughout makes me wonder if you do. *NM*
- 05/08/2012 05:09:42 PM
194 Views
The US doesn't always win the gold medal, you know.
- 03/08/2012 07:41:33 PM
536 Views
one silver, two bronze, one boycott -- all others gold since 1936
- 04/08/2012 05:55:11 PM
439 Views
I prefer athletes to put in their best performances, since their wages are paid for by spectators
- 03/08/2012 07:04:33 PM
464 Views
You really don't seem to grasp athletic competitions too well, it seems
- 03/08/2012 09:31:53 PM
562 Views
The "professionals shouldn't compete" argument is one of the dumbest things I've read in months.
- 06/08/2012 07:08:56 AM
424 Views