Active Users:429 Time:18/09/2025 09:33:47 PM
You'd have us kick out every Olympian other than the boxers, then? Stephen Send a noteboard - 04/08/2012 06:00:08 PM
Frankly the Olympics is about having all the best athletes in the world competing against each other at the same time in the one location. If that means every participant is a professional, then I am okay with that.
"I mean, if everyone had a soul, there would be no contrast by which we could appreciate it. For giving us this perspective, we thank you." - Nate
Reply to message
/olympics: is it necessary to win a basketball game by 80+ points? - 03/08/2012 08:39:56 AM 696 Views
hehe you're funny - 03/08/2012 02:25:29 PM 446 Views
There's also a fairly large South-East Asian pro league. *NM* - 03/08/2012 03:10:58 PM 199 Views
actually it is their fault they're so good..... - 03/08/2012 04:03:41 PM 475 Views
Yes, yes it is *NM* - 03/08/2012 03:20:16 PM 214 Views
Did you read coach K's response? - 03/08/2012 03:50:26 PM 483 Views
i saw it this morning after i had already posted the original comment - 03/08/2012 04:32:08 PM 541 Views
I guess I still don't understand your complaint. - 03/08/2012 06:17:05 PM 462 Views
my main objection is how the olympics are now nothing more than an extension of pro leagues - 04/08/2012 05:39:08 PM 399 Views
You'd have us kick out every Olympian other than the boxers, then? - 04/08/2012 06:00:08 PM 387 Views
no, i'd have the olympics be more about sport and less about money - 04/08/2012 06:12:24 PM 407 Views
But you seem to be objecting to the NBA players taking part... - 04/08/2012 06:17:32 PM 443 Views
"Need" - 03/08/2012 06:17:26 PM 412 Views
Re: "Need" - 04/08/2012 05:53:39 PM 419 Views
The US doesn't always win the gold medal, you know. - 03/08/2012 07:41:33 PM 515 Views
one silver, two bronze, one boycott -- all others gold since 1936 - 04/08/2012 05:55:11 PM 415 Views
Yes, it is, and I find it ridiculous you even had to ask. - 03/08/2012 08:51:09 PM 512 Views

Reply to Message